BurackElmer H., “The Impact of the Computer on Business Management,”The Business Quarterly (Spring, 1966).
2.
See DubinRobert, Leadership and Productivity (San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co., 1965).
3.
BrodyRodney H., “Computers in Top-Level Decision Making,”Harvard Business Review (July/August, 1967), pp. 67–76.
4.
WoodwardJoan, Management and Technology (London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1965).
5.
MegginsonLeon C., Personnel, A Behavioral Approach to Administration (Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1967), p. 139.
6.
BurackMcNichols, op. cit.
7.
Based on a study made by the Carnegie Institute of Technology, “The Rising Crisis in Skills, More Jobs Than Skills,”Steel (September 7, 1964), p. 58.
8.
CarrelsLouis, “Eight Steps to Better Training,”Nation's Business (March, 1961), p. 40.
9.
For a positive approach to forecasting these manpower implications see HaasePeter E.“Technological Change and Manpower Forecasts,”Industrial Relations (May, 1966), pp. 59–71.
10.
Based on BurackElmer H.McNicholsThomas J., op. cit.; also, an earlier series of studies reported in BurackElmer H., “Industrial Management in Advanced Production Systems, Some Theoretical Concepts and Preliminary Findings,”Administrative Science Quarterly (December, 1967).
11.
BrightJames R., Research Development and Technological Innovation (Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, 1964), pp. 130–134.
12.
Developed by RaffaeleJ. A., “Automation and the Coming Infusion of Power in Industry,”Personnel (May-June, 1962), pp. 32–33; and Megginson, op. cit., p. 135.
13.
BuckinghamWalter, “The Human Side of Automation,”DavisKeithScottWilliam G., eds., Readings in Human Relations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966).
14.
See BennisWarren, Changing Organizations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966); and BurackElmer H., “Technology and Supervisory Functions: A Preliminary View,”Human Organization (Winter, 1967), pp. 256–264.
15.
Bright, loc. cit.
16.
MichaelDonald N., “Some Long Range Implications of Computer Technology for Human Behavior in Organization,”The American Behavioral Scientist (April, 1966), p. 29.
17.
Based on a recent survey of employers by the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Manpower, Automation, and Training, “Formal Occupational Training of Adult Workers,” Manpower and Automation Research Monograph No. 2 (Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, December, 1964).
18.
Suggested in a panel on manpower and obsolescence at the 32nd Annual Midwestern Conference, Industrial Relations Association, University of Chicago (October, 1967).
19.
GouldnerAlvin, “Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy” (Glencoe: Free Press, 1954).
20.
See GardnerJohn W., Self-Renewal (New York: Harper & Row, 1964).
21.
CassidyRobert E., “Manpower Planning: A Co-ordinated Approach,”Personnel (September, 1963), p. 35.