FlavellJohn, The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1963).
2.
BrunerJ. S., Essays for the Left Hand (New York: Atheneum, 1966).
3.
BrunerJ. S., The Process of Education (New York: Vintage Books, 1960).
4.
HarveyO. J.HuntDavidSchroderHarold, Conceptual Systems and Personality Organization (New York: John Wiley, 1961).
5.
GoldsteinK.ScheererM., “Abstract and Concrete Behavior: An Experimental Study with Special Tests,”Psychological Monographs (1941), p. 4.
6.
KrisErnst, Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art, (New York: International Universities Press, 1952).
7.
SingerJ., “The Importance of Daydreaming,”Psychology Today (1968), pp. 18–26.
8.
KaganJeromeRosmanBernice L.DayDeborahAlpertJosephPhillipsWilliam, “Information Processing in the Child: Significance of Analytic and Reflective Attitudes,”Psychological Monographs (1964).
9.
KolbDavid A., “Individual Learning Styles and the Learning Process,” MIT Sloan School Working Paper No. 535-71, 1971.
PlovnickM. S., “A Cognitive Ability Theory of Occupational Roles,”MIT School of Management, Working Paper No. 524-71, Spring 1971.
14.
KuhnThomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952).
15.
LehmanH. C., Age and Achievement (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1953).
16.
PoundsWilliam, “On Problem Finding,” Sloan School Working Paper No. 145-65, 1965.
17.
StabellCharles, “The Impact of a Conversational Computer System on Human Problem Solving Behavior,” unpublished working paper, MIT Sloan School, 1973.
18.
BrunerJ. S.GoodnowJ. J.AustinG. A., A Study of Thinking (New York: Wiley & Sons, 1956).
19.
GrochowJerrold, “Cognitive Style as a Factor in the Design of Interactive Decision-support Systems,” Ph. D. thesis, MIT Sloan School, 1973.
20.
LawrencePaulLorschJay, Organization and Environment (Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, 1967), p. 11.
21.
WeisnerF., “Learning Profiles and Managerial Styles of Managers,” S.M. thesis, Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1971. (I have reanalyzed Weisner's data for presentation here.).
22.
“t” tests for significance of difference between groups on the abstract/concrete dimension yield the following one-tail probabilities that are less than 0.10. Marketing is more concrete than personnel (p < 0.10), engineering (p < 0.05), research (p < 0.005), and finance (p < 0.005). Finance and research are more abstract than personnel (on both comparisons p < 0.005). On the active/reflective dimension, research is more reflective than marketing (p < 0.05), engineering (p < 0 .05), and to a lesser extent finance (p < 0.10).