“Student Attitudes Toward Industry,”Personnel Journal (June 1970), p. 517; Work in America: Report of a Special Task Force to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1973); and MyersM. ScottMeyersSusan S., “Toward Understanding the Changing Work Ethic,”California Management Review (Spring 1974), pp. 7–19; TerkelStuds, Working (New York: Pantheon Books, 1974); and RosowJerome M., The Worker and the Job: Coping with Change (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974).
2.
See, for instance, JordanDePree, “Let's Hear It for the Work Ethic,”Administrative Management (November 1973), pp. 67–70; DentFrederick B., “The Myth of the Dissatisfied Worker,”Public Relations Journal (October 1973), pp. 10–11; WattenburgBen J., The Real America: A Surprising Examination of the State of the Union (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1974); and KahnRobert L., “The Meaning of Work: Interpretation and Proposals for Measurement,” in CampbellAngusConversePhilip E. (eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972).
3.
See PfiffnerJohn M.SherwoodFrank P., Administrative Organization (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1960); and KayEmanuel, Crisis in Middle Management (New York: Amacom, 1974).
4.
See DubinRobert, “Industrial Workers' World: A Study of the ‘Central Life Interest’ of Industrial Workers,”Social Problems (January 1956), pp. 131–146; and KaplanH. Roy, “Job Enrichment,”Personnel Journal (October 1969), pp. 791–798.
5.
See RodgersWillard L.JohnstonLloyd D., “Attitudes Toward Business and Other American Institutions” (paper presented at the conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 31, 1974); and “Anti-Business Sentiment Hits a New High,”Opinion Research Corporation Public Opinion Index (January 1974), p. 5.
6.
BowmanJames S.NormanDavid, “Attitudes Toward the Public Service: A Survey of University Students,”Public Personnel Management (March-April 1975).
7.
See LabawPatriciaRappeportMichael, “Alienation: Policy vs. Structure” (Opinion Research Corporation, Princeton, N.J.; mimeograph, 1974); AttenboroughRichard E., “Attitudes Toward Large Companies: A Longitudinal Study of Public Opinion” (paper presented at the conference of the American Psychological Association, September 1, 1974); and “Mounting Public Pressure for Corporate Social Responsibility,”Opinion Research Corporation Public Opinion Index (January 1974), pp. 1–8.
8.
BowmanJames S., “Public Opinion and the Environment: Post-Earth Day Attitudes Among) College Students,”Environment and Behavior (forthcoming).
9.
AluttoJoseph A.HrebinjakLawrence G., “The Effective Corporate Executive: An Analysis of the Stereotype,”Public Opinion Quarterly (Winter 1970–1971), pp. 617–620.
10.
See YankelovichDaniel, “The Real Meaning of the Student Revolution,”The Conference Board Record (March 1972), pp. 8–13; and YankelovichDaniel, The Changing Values on Campus: Political and Personal Attitudes on Campus (New York: Washington Square Press, 1972).
11.
GoodmanCharles S.CrawfordC. Merle, “Young Executives: A Source of New Ethics?”Personnel Journal (March 1974), pp. 180–187.
12.
“More Grads Than Jobs in '80s,”Denver Post (10 October 1974), p. 10.
13.
See WarrenVirginia Lee, “The Economy is Spawning College-Educated Servants,”New York times (9 September 1975), p. 30; BowinRobert B., “Managers Interest in Work,”Public Personnel Management (May-June 1973), pp. 182–184; TarnowieskiDale, The Changing Success Ethic (New York: American Management Association, 1973), pp. 2, 18, 24; PeterfreundStanley, “The Challenge of the ‘New Breed,’”Michigan Business Review (January 1974).
14.
For a brief overview see PrewittLena B., “Discontent in the Ranks: Is the Operative Worker Really Trapped?”Personnel Journal (October 1973), pp. 879–884; and FieldCharles K., “Middle Managers–The Overlooked Minority Group,”Personnel Administrator (May-June 1973), pp. 13–14.
15.
FrommErich, Revolution of Hope (New York: Bantam Books, 1968).
16.
Bowin, op. cit.; Tarnoweski, op. cit.; Peterfreund, op. cit.; Kay, op. cit. Also see Youth and the Meaning of Work (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor Manpower Monograph No. 32,: 1974) and GottliebDavid, “Work and Families: Great Expectations for College Seniors,”Journal of Higher Education (October 1974), pp. 535–544.
17.
DunnetteMarvin, “Why Do They Leave?”Personnel (May-June 1973), pp. 25–39; and BergIvar, Education and Jobs (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1970).
18.
See Report on Higher Education (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1971), chapter 9.
19.
See HersheyRobert, “Coming: A Locked-in Generation of Workers,”Personnel50 (November-December, 1973), pp. 23–29.
20.
See “U.S. College Survey Grades Freshman More Conservative,”Denver Post (20 January 1975), p. 6. The complete findings from the survey can be found in AstinAlexander W., The American Freshman (Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Education, 1975).
21.
Tarnowiescki, op. cit., p. 42; Kay, op. cit., p. 62.
22.
BerkwittGeorge J., “Executives in Ferment,”Dun's Review (January 1971), p. 23. Also see “The Sudden Surplus of Middle Managers,”Business Week (23 February 1974), p. 28–29; and ZonanaVictor, “Battle of the Bulge: Firms Fight an Effect of the 1950s Baby Boom—Young Executive Glut,”Wall Street Journal (18 August 1975), p. 17.
23.
Peterfreund, op. cit., p. 26.
24.
RushHaroldWikstromWalter, “The Reception of Behavioral Science in Industry,”The Conference Board Record (September 1969), pp. 45–54.
25.
DaleErnest, Management: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.; New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1973), p. 192.
26.
SimondsRollin H., “Are Organizational Principles a Thing of the Past?”Personnel47 (January-February 1970), pp. 8–11. See BowmanJames S., “The Behavioral Sciences: Fact and Fantasy in Organizations,”Personnel Journal (forthcoming).
27.
Tarnowieski, op. cit., p. 50.
28.
See “A Conversation with Warren Bennis,”Organizational Dynamics (Winter 1974), pp. 51–66; BennisWarren, “An OD Expert in the Cat Bird's Seat,”Journal of Higher Education (May 1973), pp. 389–398; and McGregorDouglas, quoted in LeeJames A., “Behavioral Theory vs. Reality,”Harvard Business Review (March-April 1971), p. 27. Also refer to WilcoxHerbert C., “Hierarchy, Human Nature, and the Participation Panacea,”Public Administration Review (January-February 1969), pp. 53–63.