“Today's Executive: Private Steward and Public Servant,”Harvard Business Review (March–April 1978), p.94
2.
BrownerWilliam G.MotamediKurt K., “Transition at the Top,”California Management Review (Winter 1977), pp. 71, 73.
3.
The open systems view of organizations in interaction with their environments has become a dominant theme in organization theory literature. For a more extensive discussion of open systems and environmental views see: AldrichHoward E., Organizations and Environments (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1979); EdmundsStahrlLeteyJohn, Environmental Administration (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973); KastFremont E.RosenzweigJames E., Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach, 3rd edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979); KatzDanielKahnRobert L., The Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd edition (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978); and PfefferJeffreySalancikGerald R., The External Control of Organizations (New York: Harper & Row, 1978).
4.
ParkeRobertSeidmanDavid, “Social Indicators and Social Reporting,”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (January 1978), p. 1.
5.
For a background on these two developments see: BauerRaymond A., “The Corporate Social Audit: Getting on the Learning Curve,”California Management Review (Fall 1973), pp. 5–16; and FlamholtzEric G., Human Resource Accounting (Encino, California: Dickenson, 1974).
6.
U.S. President's Commission on Social Trends, Recent Social Trends in the United States (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1933).
7.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Toward a Social Report (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1969).
8.
Ibid., p. 97.
9.
For a more complete discussion of the development of social indicators see: BauerRaymond A. (ed.), Social Indicators (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press, 1966); FoxKarl A., Social Indicators and Social Theory (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974); GrossBertram M. (ed.), “Social Goals and Indicators for American Society,”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 371, (May 1967), and Vol. 373, (September 1967); HauserPhilip M., Social Statistics in Use (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975); SheldonEleanor BernertMooreWilbert E. (eds.), Indicators of Social Change: Concepts and Measurements (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1968); and Van DusenRoxann A. (ed.), Social Indicators 1973: A Review Symposium (Washington: Social Science Research Council, Center for Coordination of Research on Social Indicators, 1974).
10.
AndrewsFrank M.WitheyStephen B., Social Indicators of Well-Being—Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality (New York: Plenum Press, 1976). p. 23.
11.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Federal Statistical Policy and Standards, Social Indicators, 1976 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1977), p. xxiii.
12.
TaeuberConrad (ed.), “America in the Seventies: Some Social Indicators,”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (January 1978).
13.
U.S. Department of Commerce, op. cit., p. xxiii.
14.
For further discussion of the current development and use of social indicators in the U.S. and other countries see: de NeufvilleJudith Innes, Social Indicators and Public Policy (Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company, 1975); LandKenneth C.SpilermanSeymour (eds.), Social Indicator Models (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975); Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Measuring Social Well-Being: A Progress Report on the Development of Social Indicators (Paris: OECD, 1976); and MichalosAlex C. (ed.), Social Indicators Research, a quarterly journal (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1974).
15.
CooperM.R.MorganB.S.FoleyP.M.KaplanL.B., “Changing Employee Values: Deepening Discontent?”Harvard Business Review (January–February 1979), pp. 117–125.
16.
U.S. Long-Term Economic Growth Prospects: Entering a New Era, a staff study prepared for the use of the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978).