HackmanJ. Richard, “On the Coming Demise of Job Enrichment,” in CassZimmer (eds.), Man and Work in Society (New York: Van Nostrand, 1975).
2.
See for example FordR., “Motivation Through the Work Itself,” excerpt in MaherJ. R. (ed.), New Perspectives On Job Enrichment (New York: Van Nostrand, 1971), p. 214.
3.
Ibid.
4.
See for example Guest and Fatchett's discussion of work restriction as an important dimension of “participation” in Worker Participation: Individual Control and Performance (London: Garden Press, 1974), pp. 96ff.
5.
For an insightful and quite early understanding of modern worker “indocility,” see OrtegaJose y Gasset, The Revolt of the Masses (New York: New American Library, 1962), p. 47.
6.
GuestFatchett, op. cit.
7.
SmithH. R., “The Half-Loaf of Job Enrichment,”Personnel (March-April 1976).
8.
MosseC., The Ancient World of Work (London: Chatto and Windus, 1961), p. 1.
9.
“Job Enrichment: Another Part of the Forest,”Industrial Relations Research Association, Proceedings (1972), pp. 154–59.
10.
“Job Enrichment, Individual Differences, and Worker Responses,”Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 69 (1969). See also ReifLuthans, “Does Job Enrichment Really Pay Off?”California Management Review, Vol. XV, No. 1 (1972).
11.
“What's Wrong With Work in America: A Review Essay,”Monthly Labor Review (March 1973).
12.
LawrencePaul R., “Individual Differences in the World of Work,” in CassZimmer, op. cit., pp. 19–29.
13.
Kahn, “In Search of the Hawthorne Effect,” in CassZimmer, op. cit., p. 59.
14.
BanfieldEdward, The Unheavenly City (Boston: Little, Brown, 1968), p. 1.
15.
AllportGordon, Becoming (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955).
16.
GombergWilliam, “Job Satisfaction: Sorting Out The Nonsense,”AFL-CIO American Federationist (June 1973).