Just-in-Time Purchasing: A Challenge for U.S. Industry

Abstract

Traditional U.S. purchasing is under assault. Japanese purchasing practices, featuring frequent “just-in-time” deliveries in small quantities, have made inroads among Japanese subsidiaries in the United States and more recently in the U.S. auto industry. Just-in-time (JIT) buying tends to be accompanied by a host of structural changes: Long-term, stable buyer-supplier relationships; avoidance of annual rebidding; sole-source contracts; improved containerization; and localized buying, to name just a few. The benefits of JIT purchasing, to both buyer and supplier, include lower material costs, higher productivity, and improved qualify. The strategic advantages—growth of market share and stable relationships—can be significant. Geographical vastness is one of several obstacles in the way of widespread use of JIT buying practices in the United States. The companies that have pioneered in the development of JIT purchasing in this country have demonstrated that most of the obstacles are not insurmountable.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

“Auto Makers Have Trouble with ‘Kanban’,”

The Wall Street Journal (Wednesday, 7 April 1982), pp. 34, 42; see, also, “GM Spreads the Misery,” Newsweek (5 April 1982), pp. 54–55; “GM's Changes in Buying Steel Upset Industry,” The Wall Street Journal (Thursday, 6 May 1982), p. 27; and “U.S. Auto Makers Reshape for World Competition,” Business Week (21 June 1982), pp. 82–85, 88, 92.

Hayes

Robert W.

, “Why Japanese Factories Work,” Harvard Business Review, 59, No. 4 (July/August 1981): 59.

Crosby

Philip B.

, Interviewed in: Smock

Douglas

, ed., “How to Stem the Tide of Shoddy Materials,” Purchasing, 92, No. 9 (13 May 1982): 51.

For a discussion of Kawasaki's just-in-time system for production see Schonberger

Richard J.

Sutton

Doug

Claunch

Jerry

, “Kanban (Just-in-Time) Applications at Kawasaki, USA,” 1981 Conference Proceedings, American Production and Inventory Control Society (Boston, 6–9 October 1981), pp. 188–91. Also, Hall

Robert W.

, “Kawasaki U.S.A.—Transferring Japanese Production Methods to the United States,” American Production and Inventroy Control Society, Inc., 1982.

Bornemann

Alfred J.

, Essentials of Purchasing, (Columbus, Ohio: Grid, Inc., 1974), p. 131.

Aljian

George

, ed., Purchasing Handbook, 3rd ed., (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1973), pp. 6–30.

Skinner

Wickam

, “The Focused Factory,” Harvard Business Review, (May/June 1974), pp. 113–21.

The tendency of Japanese companies to gain flexibility and efficiency through use of small self-developed machines in multiple copies—instead of one “super-machine”—is related to this strategy. See Schonberger

Richard J.

, Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity, (New York: The Free Press, 1982), Chapter 6.

Hall

Robert W.

, Driving the Productivity Machine: Production Planning and Control in Japan, (Falls Church, Virginia: American Production and Inventory Control Society, Inc. 1981), pp. 28, 58.

10.

“GM's New Alliance With UAW Is Starting to Look Rather Shaky,”

The Wall Street Journal, (Wednesday, 8 June 1982), pp. 1, 18.

11.

Hartley

John R.

, “Why Japan's Ahead: The View From Tokyo,” Automotive Industries, 162, No. 3 (March 1982), p. 36.

12.

“A Computer Gadfly's Triumph,”

Fortune, (8 March 1982), pp. 74–76.