OuchiWilliam G., Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981); PascaleRichard TannerAthosAnthony G., The Art of Japanese Management: Applications for American Managers (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1981).
2.
But see, AokiMasahiko, “Risk Sharing in the Corporate Group,” in AokiMasahiko, ed., THe Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984), pp. 259–264; ShiraiTaishiro, ed., Contemporary Industrial Relations in Japan (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983).
3.
AbegglenJames C.StalkGeorgeJr., Kaisha: The Japanese Corporation (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1985); DoreRonald, Flexible Rigidities (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1986); DoreRonald, Taking Japan Seriously (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987); VogelEzra F., Comeback (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1985).
4.
See the review in LincolnJames R.McBrideKerry, “Japanese Industrial Organization in Comparative Perspective,”Annual Review of Sociology, 13 (1987): 289–312.
5.
See, for example, PerrowCharles, Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd edition (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1986).
6.
DoreRonald, British Factory, Japanese Factory: The Origins of Diversity in Industrial Relations (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1973).
7.
BlaunerRobert, “Work Satisfaction and Industrial Trends in Modern Society,” in GalensonWalterLipsetSeymour Martin, eds., Labor and Trade Unionism (New York, NY: John Wiley, 1960), pp. 339–360; HEW Report, Work in America (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1973).
8.
GoldthorpeJohn H.LockwoodDavidBechhoferF.PlattJ., The Affluent Worker: Industrial Attitudes and Behavior (London: Cambridge University Press, 1968).
9.
Dore, 1973, op.cit.
10.
LincolnJames R.KallebergArne L., “Work Organization and Workforce Commitment: A Study of Plants and Employees in the U.S. and Japan,”American Sociological Review, 50 (1985): 738–760; LincolnJames R.KallebergArne L., Culture, Control, and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the U.S. and Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
11.
KoikeKazuo, “Internal Labor Markets: Workers in Large Firms,” in ShiraiTaishiro, ed., op. cit., pp. 29–62.
12.
LazearEdward, “Why Is There Mandatory Retirement?”Journal of Political Economy, 87 (1979): 1261–1284.
13.
ColeRobert E., “Permanent Employment in Japan: Facts and Fantasies,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 26 (1972): 612–630; RohlenThomas P., For Harmony and Strength (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1974).
14.
See, for example, NakaneChie, Japanese Society (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1970).
15.
PetersThomas J.WatermanRobert H.Jr., In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies (New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1982).
16.
YoshinoMichael Y., Japan's Managerial System: Tradition and Innovation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968); Dore, 1973, op. cit.; PascaleRichard Tanner, “Zen and the Art of Management,”Harvard Business Review, 56 (1978): 153–162.
17.
ClarkRodney C., The Japanese Company (New Haven, CT: Yale, 1979).
18.
AbegglenStalk, op. cit.
19.
LincolnKalleberg, 1985, op. cit.
20.
Dore, 1973, op. cit.; Cole, 1972, op. cit.
21.
MarshRobert M.MannariHiroshi, Modernization and the Japanese Factory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977); WhitehillArthur M.TakezawaShinichi, The Other Worker: A Comparative Study of Industrial Relations in the U.S. and Japan (Honolulu, HI: East-West Center Press, 1968).
22.
LincolnKalleberg, 1989, op. cit., Chapter 4.
23.
PascaleAthos, op. cit., p. 183.
24.
Ouchi, op. cit.
25.
VogelEzra F., Modern Japanese Organization and Decision-Making (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1975); Yoshino, op. cit.
26.
ColeRobert E., Work, Mobility, and Participation (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979).
27.
PughD.S.HicksonD.J.HiningsC.R.TurnerC., “Dimensions of Organization Structure,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 13 (1968): 65–91; LincolnJames R.HanadaMitsuyoMcBrideKerry, “Organizational Structures in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (1986): 338–364.
28.
ColeRobert E., Strategies for Learning: Small Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989).
29.
Clark, op. cit.
30.
OdakaKunio, “The Japanese Style of Workers' Self-Management: From the Voluntary to the Autonomous Group,” in RusVelnkoIshikawaAkihiroWoodhouseThomas, eds., Employment and Participation (Tokyo: Chuo University Press, 1982), p. 323.
31.
BennettJohn W.IshinoIwao, Paternalism in the Japanese Economy (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1963).
32.
See, for example, Dore, 1973, op. cit.; Rohlen, op. cit.; MarshMannari, op. cit.
33.
See, for example, Goldthorpe, op. cit.
34.
Cole, 1979, op. cit.
35.
Yoshino, op. cit.
36.
KawadaH., “Workers and Their Organizations,” in KarshBernardLevineSolomon B., eds., Workers and Employers in Japan (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press), pp. 217–268; Shirai, op. cit.
37.
HanamiTadashi, Labor Relations in Japan Today (Tokyo: Kodansha International Ltd., 1979), p. 56.
38.
Bounine-CabaleJeanDoreRonaldTapiolaKari, “Flexibility in Japanese Labor Markets,” Report of the OECD Team, 1988.
39.
KoshiroKazutoshi, “The Quality of Life in Japanese Factories,” in ShiraiTaishiro, ed., Contemporary Industrial Relations in Japan (1983), pp. 63–88.
40.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L., What Do Unions Do? (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1984), Chapter 9.
41.
Ibid., p. 139.
42.
HirschmanAlbert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970).
43.
FreemanMedoff, op. cit., p. 139.
44.
BrownClairReichMichael, “When Does Union-Management Cooperation Work: A Look at NUMMI and GM-Van Nuys,” in MitchellDaniel J.B.WildhornJane, eds., Can California Be Competitive and Caring? (Los Angeles, CA: Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California, 1989), pp. 115–147.