PetersThomas J.WatermanRobert H.Jr., In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best Run Companies, (New York. NY: Harper & Row, 1982).
2.
American Supplier Institute, Quality Function Deployment, Version 2.1, Dearborn. MI.
3.
PayneJohn W.BettmanJames R.JohnsonEric J., “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective,”Annual Review of Psychology, 43 (1992): 87–131.
4.
See, e.g., GreenPaul E.SrinivasanV., “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing Research: New Developments and Directions,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (October 1990): 3–19.
5.
HuberJoelPayneJohn W.PutoChristopher, “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (June 1982): 90–98.
6.
SimonsonItamarTverskyAmos, “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (August 1992): 281–295.
7.
SimonsonItamar, “The Effect of Buying Decisions on Consumers' Assessments of Their Tastes”Marketing Letters, 2/1 (1991): 5–14.
8.
DharRaviSimonsonItamar, “The Effect of the Focus of Comparison on Consumer Preferences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (November 1992): 430–440.
9.
SimonsonItamarNowlisStephenLemonKay, “The Effect of Local Consideration Sets on Global Choice Between Lower Price and Higher Quality,”Marketing Science (in press).
10.
SimonsonTversky, op. cit.
11.
SimonsonNowlisLemon, op. cit.
12.
SimonsonItamar, “The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19/1 (1992): 105–118.
13.
LevinIrwin P.GaethGary J., “How Consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15/3 (1988): 374–378.
14.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos, “Choices, Values, and Frames,”American Psychologist, 39/4 (1984): 341–350.
SimonsonItamar, “The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (May 1990): 150–162.
17.
SimonsonItamarWinerRussell S., “The Influence of Purchase Quantity and Display Format on Consumer Preference for Variety.”Journal of Consumer Research, 19/1 (1992): 133–138.
18.
SimonsonItamarCarmonZivO'CurrySuzanne, “Experimental Evidence on the Negative Effect of Product Features and Sales Promotions on Brand Choice,”Marketing Science (in press).
19.
SimonsonItamarNowlisStephenSimonsonYael, “The Effect of Irrelevant Preference Arguments on Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Psychology (in press).
20.
GriffinAbbieHauserJohn R., “The Voice of the Customer.”Marketing Science, 12/1 (1993): 1–27
21.
GlazerRashiSimonsonItamar, “Context Effects in Group and Individual Managerial Decision Making,” working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1992).
22.
“Irrational” influences can be loosely defined as influences that appear inconsistent with the assumption that consumers know what they want and choose the alternatives that offer them the highest values.