The Role of the Anthropologist in Identification at Two Urban Medical Examiner Offices: New York City and Harris County

Abstract

Two urban jurisdiction medical examiner offices, the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (NYC OCME) and the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences (HCIFS), receive large numbers of unidentified decedents each year. In 2015, the NYC OCME received over 400 decedents whose identities were initially reported as unknown. The HCIFS received 226 unknown decedent cases in 2015. These offices have faced similar challenges in the past when pursuing identification of long-term and otherwise complex identification cases. Within the past decade, the NYC OCME and HCIFS have successfully integrated forensic anthropologists into their offices to supervise routine identifications, direct resolution efforts in complex identification cases, manage disaster victim identification efforts, and organize community outreach events focused on identification. Accordingly, the NYC OCME and HCIFS anthropologists have successfully streamlined identification procedures to make them more efficient for all cases, and increased identifications of completely unknown individuals, effectively discharging the statutory responsibility held by the Chief Medical Examiner for decedent identification.

Keywords

Forensic pathology Missing persons Medicolegal identification Forensic anthropology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

NamUs: National missing and unidentified persons system [Internet]. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice; 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 23]. Available from: http://www.namus.gov/.

Mass fatality incidents: a guide for human forensic identification [Internet]. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice: 2005 Jun [cited 2016 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/199758.pdf.

Mehta

, Dhariwal

Design and implementation of features based on fingerprint image matching system. Int J Multidiscip Curr Res [Internet]. 2014 Dec [cited 2016 Jul 23]; 2(6): 1183–90. Available from: http://ijmcr.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Paper161183-1190.pdf.

Kaushal

, Kaushal

Human identification and fingerprints: a review. J Biomet Biostat. 2011; 2(4): 1–5. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.4172/2155-6180.1000123.

Fournier

N.A.

, Ross

A.H.

Sex, ancestral, and pattern type variation of fingerprint minutiae: a forensic perspective on anthropological dermatoglyphics. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2016 Aug; 160(4): 625–32. PMID: 26397817. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1002/ajpa.22869.

Neumann

, Stern

Forensic examination of fingerprints: past, present, and future. Chance. 2016 Jan; 29(1): 9–16. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/09332480.2016.1156353.

Dirkmaat

A companion to forensic anthropology. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons; c2014. Chapter 7, Forensic anthropology at the mass fatality incident (commercial airliner) crash scene; p. 136–56.

Kontanis

E.J.

, Sledzik

P.S.

Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; c2008. Chapter 17, Resolving commingling issues during the medicolegal investigation of mass fatality incidents; p. 317–36.

Mundorf

A.Z.

Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; c2008. Chapter 7, Anthropologist-directed triage: three distinct mass fatality events involving fragmentation of human remains; p. 123–44.

10.

Steadman

D.W.

, Sperry

, Snow

Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; c2008. Chapter 5, Anthropological investigations of the tri-state crematorium incident; p. 81–96.

11.

Steadman

D.W.

Forensic science: current issues, future directions. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2013. Chapter 5, The places we will go: paths forward in forensic anthropology; p. 131–59.