THIS STUDY EXPLORES KOREAN childcare teachers' attitudes toward the integration of care and education and the primary issues related to such integration. Ninety-three childcare teachers (91 females and two males) residing in the Seoul metropolitan areas of South Korea participated in this study. Most teachers in this study believed that combining care and education would enhance the professionalisation of the early care and education field and enable better services for children. The teachers expected the following fundamental elements from the integration: heightened criteria for teacher certifications; better work conditions for teachers; age-specific standardised curricula; and improvements to the quality of facilities because of consolidated administration and management. However, the teachers were concerned with possible challenges in the childcare field after integration and its impact on childcare teachers' job opportunities. The teachers' perspectives voiced in this study offer timely data that may facilitate the development of specific guidelines and directives for the integration of care and education. Implications from this study may also contribute valuable information to other countries experiencing similar challenges in combining early education and care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottL., & LangstonA. (2005). Birth to three matters: A framework to support children in their earliest years. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(1), 129–143.
2.
Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2011). Guide to the Education and Care Services National Law and the Education and Care Services National Regulations, 2011.Canberra, ACT: ACECQA.
3.
BennettJ., & KagaY. (2010). The integration of early childhood systems within education. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 4(1), 35–43.
4.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
BrewerM. B., & ChenY. R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133–151.
6.
ChoiY. K. (2013). Child care development considering the remuneration system of childcare teachers. Welfare Trends, 176, 26–33.
7.
CoppleC., & BredekampS. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
8.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
9.
HadaddL. (2002). An integrated approach to early childhood education and care. Early Childhood and Family Policy Series No.3. Paris, France: UNESCO.
10.
HadfieldM., JoplingM., NeedhamM., WallerT., ColeyshawL., EmiraM., & RoyleK. (2012). Longitudinal study of early years professional status: An exploration of progress, leadership and impact. Final report (Vol. DFE-RR239c). Wolverhampton, UK: CeDare, University of Wolverhampton.
11.
KimE. S., LeeJ. H., KimH. J., & BaeJ. A. (2014). A comparative analysis on operation situation and needs of kindergartens and child care centers (Report No. 2014–17). Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute of Child Care and Education.
12.
KimE. Y., KimK. S., & LeeY. J. (2014). An analysis on the teacher certification systems for kindergartens and child care programs (Report No. 2014–18). Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute of Child Care and Education.
13.
KleinA. (1992). The debate over child care 1969–1990. A sociohistorical analysis.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14.
LeeJ. H. (2011). The professionalism ideology objection concerning child care teachers' education: In child care teachers' training center. The Journal of Education Research, 32(1), 1–16.
15.
LeeM., SuhM. H., LimY., & LeeJ. H. (2012). An investigation of the current costs of standard childcare (Report No. 2012–15). Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute of Child Care and Education.
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2013). Ministry of Health and Welfare Statistical Yearbook 2013.Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare.
19.
OsgoodJ. (2009). Childcare workforce reform in England and the ‘early years professional’: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 24(6), 733–751.
20.
ParkS., YangS., & WeeS. J. (2014). Are we experts? Perspectives of Korean teachers on their careers in infant and toddler care. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(1), 56–64.
21.
Productivity Commission. (2014). Childcare and early childhood learning (Inquiry Report No. 73). Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Productivity Commission.
22.
SimsM. (2014). Is the care–education dichotomy behind us? Should it be? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 4–11.
23.
SmithA. (1988). Education and care components in New Zealand child care centres and kindergartens. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 15(4), 16–23.
24.
TurielE. (2004). Commentary: Beyond individualism and collectivism—a problem, or progress? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(104), 91–100. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience.New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
26.
WilliamsonB., & MorganJ. (2009). Educational reform, enquiry-based learning and the re-professionalisation of teachers. The Curriculum Journal, 20(3), 287–304.
