Play-based Learning and Intentional Teaching: Forever Different?

Abstract

PLAY-BASED LEARNING IS a cornerstone of early childhood education provision. Play provides opportunities for young children to explore ideas, experiment with materials and express new understandings. Play can be solitary, quiet and reflective. Play can also be social, active and engaging. While play is commonly understood as the basis for learning in early childhood education, this is not always the situation in all settings. Cultural variations in learning and play suggest that social interactions and observational learning also create powerful pedagogical learning environments for young children. International and national research highlights the value of sustained and reflective interactions between children and educators in promoting children's learning. Increasingly, the notion of quality in play-based pedagogy invites educators to integrate traditional beliefs about play with new insights into the role of social interactions, modelling and relationships in young children's learning.

Overseas, the movement towards quality play-based pedagogy reflects debate and policy initiatives captured by the notion of intentional teaching. In Australia, the Early Years Learning Framework makes explicit reference to intentional teaching. Intentional teaching arguably engages educators and children in shared thinking and problem solving to build the learning outcomes of young children. However, the pedagogical relationship between play-based learning and intentional teaching remains difficult to conceptualise. This is because the value placed on the exploratory potential of play-based learning can appear to be at odds with the role of intentional teaching in promoting knowledge development. This paper reaches beyond binary constructs of play and intentional teaching, and invites consideration of a new Pedagogical Play-framework for inspiring pedagogical and curriculum innovation in the early years.

This paper was a keynote address at the 2016 Early Childhood Australia National Conference addressing the theme Inspire-be inspired to reach beyond quality.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

, & Fleer

(2016). The relations between a ‘pushdown’ and ‘push-up’ curriculum: A cultural-historical study of home-play pedagogy in the context of structured learning in international schools in Malaysia. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 328–342.

Askew

(2013). Mediating learning number bonds through a Vygotskian lens of scientific concepts. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 3(2), 1–20.

Bateson

(1976). A theory of play and fantasy. In Bruner

, Jolly

& Sylva

(Eds.), Play and its role in development and evolution (pp. 119–130). New York, NY: Basic Books.

Bergen

(2014). Foundations of play theory. In Brooker

, Blaise

& Edwards

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of play and learning in early childhood (pp. 5–21). London, UK: SAGE Publishing.

Bruner

(1971). The act of discovery. In Raths

, Pancella

& Van Ness

(Eds.), Studying teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 190–201). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Chaiklin

(2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin

, Gindis

, Ageyev

& Miller

(Eds.), Vygotsky's education theory in cultural context (pp. 39–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cheng

(2001). Difficulties of Hong Kong teachers' understanding and implementation of ‘play’ in the curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 857–869.

Cutter-Mackenzie

, Edwards

, Moore

, & Boyd

(2014). Young children's play and environmental education in early childhood education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

10.

Dewey

(1969). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

11.

Dockett

(2010). The challenge of play for early childhood education. In Rogers

(Ed.), Rethinking play and pedagogy in early childhood education. Concepts, contexts and cultures (pp. 32–48). New York, NY: Routledge.

12.

Duncan

(2009). Intentional teaching. Early childhood education educate. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

13.

Edwards

, & Cutter-Mackenzie

(2011). Environmentalising early childhood curriculum through play-based pedagogies. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(1), 51–59.

14.

Edwards

, & Cutter-Mackenzie

(2013). Pedagogical play-types: What do they suggest for learning about sustainability in early childhood education? International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(3), 327–346.

15.

Edwards

, Cutter-Mackenzie

, Moore

, & Boyd

(2017). Finding the balance: A play-framework for play-based learning and intentional teaching in early childhood education. Every Child, 23(1), 14–15. Canberra, ACT: Early Childhood Australia.

16.

Epstein

(2007). The intentional teacher. Choosing the best strategies for young children's leaning. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

17.

Fleer

(2009). A cultural historical perspective on play: Play as a leading activity across cultural communities. In Pramling-Samuelsson

& Fleer

(Eds.), Play and learning in early childhood settings (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

18.

Fleer

(2011). ‘Conceptual play’: Foregrounding imagination and cognition during concept formation in early years education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(3), 224–240.

19.

Gelman

, & Kalish

(2006). Conceptual development. In Lerner

R.M.

(Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp.687–730). New York, NY: Wiley.

20.

Gupta

(2014). Diverse early childhood education policies and practices. Voices and images from five countries in Asia. New York, NY: Routledge.

21.

Hatch

(2010). Rethinking the relationship between learning and development: Teaching for learning in early childhood classrooms. The Educational Forum, 74(2), 58–68.

22.

Huizinga

(1955). Homo ludens. A study of the play element in culture. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

23.

Johnson

(2014). Play provisions and pedagogy in curricular approaches. In Brooker

, Blaise

& Edwards

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of play and learning in early childhood (pp.180–192). London, UK: SAGE Publishing.

24.

Nyland

, & Ng

(2016). International perspectives on early childhood curriculum changes in Singapore and Australia. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(8), 465–476. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1102416

25.

Ogunyemi

F. T.

, & Ragpot

(2015). Work and play in early childhood education: Views from Nigeria and South Africa. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(3), 1–7.

26.

Pramling Samuelsson

, & Kaga

(2008). The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society. Paris, France: UNESCO.

27.

Rubin

K. H.

, Fein

G. G.

& Vandenberg

(1983). Play. In Hetherington

E.M.

(Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 4, Socialization, personality, and social development. (4th ed.) (pp. 694–774). New York, NY: Wiley.

28.

Ryan

, & Goffin

(2008). Missing in action. Teaching in early care and education. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 385–395.

29.

Siraj-Blatchford

(2009). Conceptualising progression in the pedagogy of play and sustained shared thinking in early childhood education: A Vygotskian perspective. Educational and Child Psychology, 26(2), 77–89.

30.

Stephen

(2010). Pedagogy: The silent partner in early years learning. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 30(1), 15–28. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/09575140903402881

31.

Sumsion

, Barnes

, Cheeseman

, Harrison

, Kennedy

, & Stonehouse

(2009). Insider perspectives on developing Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 4–13.

32.

Sutton-Smith

(2009). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

33.

Trawick-Smith

(2012). Teacher–child play interactions to achieve learning outcomes. In Pianta

(Ed.), Handbook of early childhood education (pp. 259–277). New York, NY: Guildford Press.

34.

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 12). Geneva, Switzerland: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

35.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In Bruner

, Jolly

& Sylva

(Eds.), Play and its role in development and evolution (pp. 537–555). New York, NY: Basic Books.

36.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber

R.W.

, Carton

A. S.

(Eds.) & Minick

(Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1, Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

37.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

38.

Wallerstedt

, & Pramling

(2012). Learning to play in a goal directed practice. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(1), 5–15.

39.

Wood

, & Attfield

(2005). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (2nd ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publishing.

40.

Wood

(2010). Developing integrated pedagogical approaches to play and learning. In Broadhead

, Howard

& Wood

(Eds.), Play and learning in the early years (pp. 9–27). London, UK: SAGE Publishing.