THE CURRENT POLICY CONTEXTS of many countries demand that early childhood educators are able to articulate their practice in new ways. For example, the need to assess and report positive learning outcomes in multiple ways to policy-makers, families and educational systems is a feature of contemporary early childhood education and care. This theoretical paper introduces a multi-dimensional framework to support the assessment of young children's learning and then provides an example of how modified tools drawn from Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) can be used to effectively examine these dimensions of learning. CDA is a multidisciplinary methodology that integrates the study of language with a consideration of wider social practices. It offers a perspective from which to examine how ways of thinking, speaking, acting and being are drawn from, and also contribute to the particular discourses that are made available within social institutions (in this case, early childhood centres). CDA focuses on how language establishes and maintains social relationships and identities. This paper provides an example of how some of the tools made available in CDA can enhance assessment practices with young children. It is argued that CDA enables early childhood educators to re-examine young children's learning in new ways. The processes outlined in this paper have the potential to inspire early childhood educators to embrace assessment as an opportunity to articulate, celebrate and communicate young children's ways of knowing in new ways.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsonE., & BrennanD. (2014). Social investment or private profit? Diverging notions of ‘investment’ in early childhood education and care. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(1), 47–61.
2.
CannellaG. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution.New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
3.
CarrM., & LeeW. (2013). Learning stories: Constructing learner identities in early education.London, UK: Sage Publications.
4.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
5.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2010). Educators Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Educators' guide to the Early Years Learning Framework.Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
6.
DerewiankaB. (2011). A grammar companion for primary teachers.Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
7.
DreyfusH., & RabinowP. (1982). Michael Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics.Chicago, IL: The Harvester Press.
DrummondM. (2008). Assessment and values. In SwaffieldS. (Ed.), Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application (pp. x–y). London, UK: Routledge.
10.
EdwardsB., BaxterJ., SmartD., SansonA., & HayesA. (2009). Financial disadvantage and children's school readiness. Family Matters, 83, 23–31.
11.
EglinP., & HesterS. (1992). Category, predicate and task: The pragmatics of practical action. Semiotica, 88(3/4), 243–268.
12.
FaircloughN. (1992a). Discourse and social change.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
13.
FaircloughN. (Ed.). (1992b). Critical language awareness.New York, NY: Longman Group.
GeeJ. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology and social practice.New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
16.
GeeJ. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
17.
GeeJ. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method.London, UK: Routledge.
18.
GeoffroyM., CoteS., GiguereC., DionneG., ZelazoP., TremblayR., … SeguinJ. (2010). Closing the gap in academic readiness and achievement: The role of early childcare. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(12), 1359–1367.
19.
HallidayM. (1985). Spoken and written language.Burwood, Vic.: Deakin University Press.
20.
HedgesH. (2014). Young children's ‘working theories': Building and connecting understandings. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 12(1), 35–49
21.
HedgesH., & CullenJ. (2005). Subject knowledge in early childhood curriculum and pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 66–79.
22.
HilfertyF., RedmondG., & KatzL. (2010). The implications of poverty on children's readiness to learn. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(4), 63–71.
23.
IlfeldE. (1999). Stories we tell, moments that stay with us. In SmaleJ. (Ed.), Early childhood matters (Vol. 93, pp. 18–42). The Hague, Netherlands: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
24.
JayyusiL. (1984). Categorisation and the moral order.Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
25.
KatzL. (1988). What should young children be doing? American Educator, 12(2), 28–33, 44–45.
26.
KatzL. (1993). Dispositions: Definitions and implications for early childhood practices.New York, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.
27.
KatzL. (2008). Making our practices more authentic. The challenge: Research for a new culture of childhood. Reggio Emilia—Australia Information Exchange, 12(3), 5–6.
28.
KatzL. (2016). Editorial. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(2), 169–172.
29.
KriegS. (2008). Competing professional identities in contemporary early childhood teacher education.Adelaide, SA: University of South Australia.
KriegS. (2010b). The professional knowledge that counts in Australian contemporary early childhood teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(2), 144–155.
32.
KriegS. (2011). The Australian Early Years Learning Framework: Learning what?Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(1), 46–55.
33.
KriegS. (2013). Transitions. In PendergastD. & GarvisS. (Eds.), Teaching early years: Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 201–216). Sydney, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
34.
LazzariA. (2014). Early childhood education and care in times of crisis. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(4), 427–431.
35.
LukeA. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In SahaL. (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of the sociology of education (pp. 50–57). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
36.
McLachlanC., EdwardsS., MargrainV., & McLeanV. (2013). Children's learning and development: Contemporary assessment in the early years.South Yarra, Vic.: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
Ministry of Education, New Zealand. (1996). Te Whariki: He whariki matuaranga mo nga mokop-una o Aoteraroa: Early childhood curriculum.Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
38.
PerkinsD., JayE., & TishmanS. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.
39.
RogersR. (Ed.). (2004). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
SacksH., ScheglofA., & JeffersonG. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
41.
SilvermanD. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction.London, UK: Sage Publications.
42.
Siraj-BlatchfordI., SylvaK., MuttockS., GildenR., & BellD. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years.London, UK: Institute of Education.
43.
SpatigL. (2005). Feminist critique of developmentalism: What's in it for teachers. Theory and Research in Education, 3(3), 299–326.
44.
SylvaK., MelhuishE., SammonsP., Siraj-BlatchfordI., & TaggartB. (2004). The Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) Project.London, UK: Institute of Education, University of London.
45.
VygotskyL. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
