WHILE THE MAJORITY OF Queensland state school students begin schooling in the first year they are eligible to do so, a small number of families delay entry. This paper explores voluntary delayed entry to state schools in Queensland through analysis of quantitative data gathered by the Department of Education and Training, and parental decision making around delayed entry via qualitative data sourced from an Australian parenting website. Results revealed that the number of children who are delayed entry is increasing, and that the majority of students delayed are boys who are the youngest in their cohort. A key reason for parents choosing to delay is the child's birth date being close to the state's cut-off entry date. Importantly, the decision of whether to delay entry appears to be emotional for parents, and it is argued that parents require support and services to help them make this decision.
BassokD., & ReardonS. F. (2013). ‘Academic redshirting’ in kindergarten: Prevalence, patterns and implications. Educational Evaluations and Policy Analysis, 35(3), 283–297.
4.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
5.
CreswellJ. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
6.
DatarA. (2006). Does delaying kindergarten entrance give children a head start? Economics of Education Review, 25(1), 43–62.
7.
DeeT. S., & SievertsenH. H. (2015). The gift of time? School starting age and mental health (Working paper 21610). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
EdwardsB., TaylorM., & FioriniM. (2011). Who gets the ‘gift of time’ in Australia? Exploring delayed primary school entry. Australian Review of Public Affairs, 10(1), 41–60.
9.
FabianH., & DunlopA. (2006). Outcomes of good practice in transition processes for children entering primary school. Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, Strong foundations: Early childhood care and education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147463e.pdf.
10.
FreyN. (2005). Retention, social promotion and academic redshirting: What do we know and need to know? Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 332–346.
11.
GraueM. E., & DiPernaJ. (2000). Redshirting and early retention: Who gets the ‘gift of time’ and what are its outcomes? American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 509–534.
12.
LinH., FreemanL. S., & ChuK. (2009). The impact of kindergarten enrolment age on academic performance through kindergarten to fifth grade. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 45–54.
13.
MarchC. (2005). Academic redshirting: Does withholding a child from school entrance for one year increase academic success? Issues in Educational Research, 15(1), 69–85.
14.
NoelA. M., & NewmanJ. (2003). Why delay kindergarten entry? A qualitative study of mothers' decisions. Early Education and Development, 14(4), 479–498.
15.
NorburyC. F., GoochD., BairdG., CharmanT., SimonoffE., & PicklesA. (2015). Younger children experience lower levels of language competence and academic progress in the first year of school: Evidence from a population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(1), 65–73.
SerryT., ImmsC., FroudeE., JoffeB., HeineC., & MerriganC. (2014). Preparatory teachers' perceptions of school readiness: A survey of Victorian teachers. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(1), 109–124.
