IN THIS ARTICLE WE use feminist post-structuralist concepts of discourse and relations of power to question how a neoliberal regime of truth in Australian early childhood education impacts educators currently working for gender equity with children, prior to their entry to schooling. We show how this regime of truth is endorsed and transferred in and by key documents of the Australian National Quality Framework (NQF) including the National Quality Standard (NQS) and the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) in which discourses of universal rights, individual freedom and choice, and human capital dominate approaches to inclusion and diversity that govern gender equity work (ACECQA, 2011, 2017a, 2017b; DEEWR, 2009; NSW Education, 2016). Our article addresses how some educators use their understandings of feminism to negotiate spaces for gender equity work within the theoretical, political and ethical tensions arising in/between discourses that constitute this neoliberal regime of truth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2011). Appendix 2: Quality Improvement Plan Template. Retrieved 7 September, 2016, from www.acecqa.gov.au/quality-improvement-plan_1.
BlaiseM. (2005). Playing it straight: Uncovering gender discourses in the early childhood classroom.New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BlaiseM. (2009). ‘What a girl wants, what a girl needs’: Responding to sex, gender and sexuality in the early childhood classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4), 450–460.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
11.
CannellaG. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
12.
CoadyM. (2017). Feminism and the development of early childhood education in Australia. In SmithK., AlexanderK. & CampbellS. (Eds.), Feminism(s) in early childhood: Using feminist theories in research and practice (pp. 11–24). Gateway East, Singapore: Springer.
DaviesB. (2003a). Frogs and snails and feminist tails.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
15.
DaviesB. (2003b). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.
16.
DaviesB., & SaltmarshS. (2007). Gender economies: Literacy and the gendered production of neo-liberal subjectivities. Gender and Education, 19(1), 1–20.
DiltsA. (2011). From ‘entrepreneur of the self’ to ‘care of the self’: Neoliberal governmentality and Foucault's ethics. Foucault Studies, 12, 130–146.
FoucaultM. (1990). The history of sexuality volume 1: The will to knowledge (R. Hurley, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
21.
FoucaultM. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison system (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
22.
LangfordR. (2010). Critiquing child-centred pedagogy to bring children and early childhood educators into the centre of a democratic pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 113–127.
23.
MacNaughtonG. (2000). Rethinking gender in early childhood education.Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
24.
MacNaughtonG. (2005). Doing Foucault in early childhood studies: Applying post-structural ideas.New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
MirowskiP. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown.New York, NY & London, UK: Verso.
26.
MossP. (2014). Transformative change and real utopias in early childhood education: A story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality.Abingdon, UK,; Oxon, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). Early learning and development: Common understandings. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/education/pdf/21_22.pdf.
29.
OsgoodJ., & RobinsonK. (2017). Celebrating pioneering and contemporary feminist approaches to the study of gender in early childhood. In SmithK., AlexanderK. & CampbellS. (Eds.), Feminism(s) in early childhood: Using feminist theories in research and practice (pp. 35–47). Gateway East, Singapore: Springer.
30.
PetersM. A., & BesleyT. A. C. (2014). Social exclusion/inclusion: Foucault's analytics of exclusion, the political ecology of social inclusion and the legitimation of inclusive education. Open Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 99–115. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/23265507.2014.972439
RabinowP. (Ed). (1991). The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault's thought.London, UK: Penguin.
33.
ReadJ. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25–36.
34.
RobinsonK. H., & Jones DiazC. (2006). Diversity and difference in early childhood education: Issues for theory and practice.Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
35.
RousseauJ. (1979). Emile, or On education (A. Bloom, Trans.). Basic Books: USA.
SleeR. (2009). The inclusion paradox. In AppleM.W., AuW. & GandinL.A. (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Education (pp. 177–189). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
SmithK., AlexanderK., & D'Souza JumaA. (2014). Gender matters in the early years classroom. In CologonK. (Ed.), Inclusive education in the early years: Right from the start (pp. 133–151). Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press.
39.
SmithK., & CampbellS. (2014). Social activism: The risky business of early childhood educators in neoliberal Australian classrooms. In SwadnerE., BlochM. & CannellaG. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early childhood care and education: Critical questions, new imaginaries and social activism (pp. 291–302). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishers.
40.
SmithK., TesarM., & MyersC. Y. (2016). Edu-capitalism and the governing of early childhood education in Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(1), 123–135.
41.
TaylorA. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood.New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris, France, 7–10 June, 1994. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF.
43.
UNESCO. (2015a). Education 2030 Incheon Declaration: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Incheon, Republic of Korea, 19–22 May, 2015. Retrieved 24 June, 2017, from http://en.unesco.org/world-education-forum-2015/incheon-declaration.
