EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT HAS GAINED increasing importance in determining life chances. Parents hoping to secure a learning advantage for their offspring are increasingly focused on the preschool years. This downward shift from primary schooling has been prompted by the ‘first three years' movement, with its emphasis on infancy and early childhood as critical periods for development and learning. So what does this mean for early years parenting? Do parents try to secure a learning advantage in the preschool years and how do they do it? This paper highlights the four resource-dependent strategies Australian parents employ, both individually and in combination, to promote their child's early learning: ‘parenting for cognitive development’, outsourcing for cognitive development, ‘concerted cultivation’ and ‘redshirting’. By highlighting these resource-dependent strategies, this study highlights the socioeconomic gap in children's access to opportunities that parents believe give children a learning advantage in the preschool years.
BaxterJ. (2010). An exploration of the timing and nature of parental time with 4–5 year olds using Australian children's time use data.Melbourne, Vic.: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Retrieved from http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/48994355.
6.
BazeleyP. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 6–22. Retrieved from: www.researchsupport.com.au/Bazeley_MJQR_2009.pdf.
7.
BellD. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. A venture in social forecasting.New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.
8.
BennettP. R., LutzA. C., & JayaramL. (2012). Beyond the schoolyard: The role of parenting logics, financial resources, and social institutions in the social class gap in structured activity participation. Sociology of Education, 85(2), 131–157. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0038040711431585
BourdieuP. (1998). The forms of capital. In HalseyA.H., LauderH., BrownP., & Stuart WellsA. (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
BradburyB., CorakM., WaldfogelJ., & WashbrookE. (2012). Inequality in early childhood outcomes. In ErmischJ., Jäntti, & SmeedingT. (Eds.), From parents to children: The intergenerational transmission of advantage (pp. 87–119). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
BruerJ. T. (1999). The myth of the first three years. A new understanding of early brain development and lifelong learning.New York, NY: The Free Press.
13.
CampbellC., ProctorH., & SheringtonG. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia.Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
CunhaF., & HeckmanJ. J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 97(2), 31–47. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w12840.pdf.
17.
de MollF., & BetzT. (2014). Inequality in pre-school education and care in Germany: An analysis by social class and immigrant status. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(3), 237–271. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/09620214.2014.932086
18.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (1994). Introduction. Entering the field of qualitative research. In DenzinN.K. & LincolnY.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.1–34). London, UK: Sage.
19.
FarrantB. M., & ZubrickS. R. (2013). Parent–child book reading across early childhood and child vocabulary in the early school years: Findings from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. First Language, 33(3), 280–293. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0142723713487617
GraueM. E., & DiPernaJ. (2000). Redshirting and early retention: Who gets the ‘gift of time’ and what are its outcomes? American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 509–534.
HulbertA. (2004). Raising America: Experts, parents, and a century of advice about children.New York, NY: Vintage Books.
25.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods. Class, race and family life.Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
26.
LareauA. (2011). Unequal childhoods. Class race and family life, with an update a decade later. (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA; London, UK: University of California Press.
McCrory CalarcoJ. (2014). Coached for the classroom: Parents' cultural transmission and children's reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 1015–1037. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0003122414546931
ReayD. (1998). Cultural reproduction: Mothers' involvement in their children's primary schooling. In GrenfellM. & JamesD. (Eds.), Bourdieu and education: Acts of practical theory (pp. 55–70). London, UK: Falmer Press.
34.
SchaubM. (2010). Parenting for cognitive development from 1950 to 2000: The institutionalization of mass education and the social construction of parenting in the United States. Sociology of Education, 83(1), 46–66. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0038040709356566
35.
SmeedingT. M., EriksonR., & JänttiM. (2011). Introduction. In SmeedingT.M., EriksonR., & JänttiM. (Eds.), Persistence, privilege, and parenting. The comparative study of intergenerational mobility (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
36.
SmythC. (2014). Boost your preschooler's brain power! An analysis of advice to parents from an Australian government-funded website. Women's Studies International Forum, 45 (July–August), 10–18. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.03.011
WallG. (2004). Is your child's brain potential maximized? Mothering in an age of new brain research. Atlantis, 28(2) 41–50. Retrieved from http://scholars.wlu.ca/soci_faculty/7/.
