Parental Knowledge and Use of the National Quality Framework in their Childcare Decision Making: Informed Believers,Informed Dismissers and Indifferent Disregarders
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2017
Parental Knowledge and Use of the National Quality Framework in their Childcare Decision Making: Informed Believers,Informed Dismissers and Indifferent Disregarders
THE INTRODUCTION OF THE National Quality Framework (NQF) aimed to improve the quality of formal early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings across Australia, and enable parents to make informed childcare choices. Since this Framework was only introduced in 2012, research has yet to determine if these intended outcomes have been achieved. The impact of this policy on the choices of prospective parents is explored. Findings suggest that prospective parents' knowledge of the Framework is low and their use of NQF quality ratings to inform ECEC decision making even lower. Various influences on prospective parents' ECEC choices appeared to prevent those who knew about the ratings from using them effectively. Notwithstanding efforts to promote the NQF and quality ratings as tools for parents when choosing ECEC for their children, findings suggest that the use of these tools is highly influenced by market failures.
BarrosS., & LealT. B. (2015). Parents' and teachers' perceptions of quality in Portuguese childcare classrooms. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(2), 209–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0235-4
8.
BoydW., ThorpeK., & TaylerC. (2010). Preferences of first-time expectant mothers for care of their child: ‘I wouldn't leave them somewhere that made me feel insecure’. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(2), 4–12.
9.
ChaudryA., HenlyJ., & MeyersM. (2010). Conceptual frameworks for child care decision-making (ACF-OPRE White Paper). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
10.
CryerD., TietzeW., & WesselsH. (2002). Parents' perceptions of their children's child care: A cross-national comparison. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(2), 259–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00148-5
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2012). Starting well: Benchmarking early education around the world. Commissioned by the LIEN Foundation. London, UK: EIU. Retrieved from http://graphics.eiu.com/upload/eb/Lienstartingwell.pdf.
13.
ElickerJ. G., LangillC. C., RuprechtK. M., LewsaderJ., & AndersonT. (2011). Evaluation of ‘Paths to QUALITY’ Indiana's child care quality rating and improvement system: Final report.West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Center for Families Publications.
14.
FenechM., HarrisonL., & SumsionJ. (2011). Parent users of high-quality long day care: Informed consumers of child care? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(1), 95–103.
15.
ForryN. D., ToutK., RothenbergL., SandstromH., & VeselyC. (2013). Child care decision-making literature review. OPRE Brief 2013–45. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
GroganK. (2012). Parents' choice of pre-kindergarten: The interaction of parent, child and contextual factors. Early Child Development and Care, 182(10), 1265–1287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2011.608127
18.
Hall & Partners Open Mind. (2014). Families research project: Knowledge and meaning of National Quality Standards ratings pilot study.South Yarra, Vic.: Hall and Partners.
19.
HandK., BaxterJ. A., SweidR., Bluett-BoydN., & Price-RobertsonR. (2014). Access to early childhood education in Australia: Insights from a qualitative study (Research Report No. 28). Melbourne, Vic.: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
20.
HatchA. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings.New York, NY: State University of New York.
21.
HeckmanJ. J., & MasterovD. V. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 29(3), 446–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x
22.
KingD., & MeagherG. (Eds.). (2009). Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices.Sydney, NSW: Sydney University Press.
23.
MarshallJ. D. (1996). The autonomous chooser and ‘reforms’ in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 15(1–2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367517
MocanN. (2007). Can consumers detect lemons? An empirical analysis of information asymmetry in the market for child care. Journal of Population Economics, 20(4), 743–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0087-6
26.
PeytonV., JacobsA. C., O'BrienM., & RoyC. (2001). Reasons for choosing child care: Associations with family factors, quality and satisfaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(2), 191–208.
ShpancerN., BowdenJ. M., FerrellM. A., PavlikS. F., RobinsonM. N., SchwindJ. L., … YoungJ. N. (2002). The gap: Parental knowledge about daycare. Early Child Development and Care, 172(6), 635–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430215108
29.
WeavenS., & GraceD. (2010). Examining parental and staff perceptions of child care service quality across competing business structures. Australasian Journal of early Childhood, 35(2), 54–62.
