This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of one mentorship program in occupational therapy as well as exploring participant reactions to the instructional activities and instructional delivery modes. Using a retrospective pretest posttest design, data were collected from 26 participants. Responses to an 18-question survey were collated and summarized using frequency and percentages. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine the significance of changes in perceived experience levels. Outcomes suggest content was relevant, understandable and impacted clinical practice. Learning activities that emphasized small group problem solving during live treatment sessions or in Q & A sessions were reported to be most useful. Results of this study enhance our understanding of professional development and provide a valuable framework for other healthcare disciplines.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2017). Continuing professional development in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 7112110017. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.716S13
2.
AtwalA., SriramV., & McKayE. A. (2023). Mentoring for black and minoritized allied health professionals in health and social care: A scoping review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16, 2251–2259. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S413085
3.
AyresJ. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Western Psychological Services.
4.
BlombergD., StephensonC., AtkinsonT.BlanshanA., CabreraD., RatelleJ. T., & MohabbatA. B. (2023). Continuing medical education the post COVID-19 pandemic era. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e49825. https://doi.org/10.2196/49825
5.
BurgessA., & McGregorD. (2018). Peer teacher training for health professional students: A systematic review of formal programs. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1356-2
6.
ChakerR., Hajj-HassanM. & OzanneS. (2024). The effects of online continuing education for healthcare professionals: A systematic scoping review. Open Education Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0226
7.
ChangR. & LittleT. D. (2018). Innovations for evaluation research: Multiform protocols, visual analog scaling and the retrospective pretest-posttest design. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 4(2), 246–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278718759396
8.
ChapmanM., LehmanE., PedersenL., SibsonA., & XiauJ. (2019). Best practices for occupational therapy fellowship and physical therapy residency programs: A mixed-method study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 17(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2019.1806
9.
ChasteenS., & ChattergoonR. (2019, July). A comparison study of pre/post-test and retrospective pre-test for measuring faculty attitude change. In Proceedings of the 2019 Physics Education Research Conference, Provo, UT. AIP. Retrieved from https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=15261&DocID=5173
10.
DahlstromE. K., BellC., ChangS., LeeH. Y., AndersonC. B., PhamA., PribbenowC. M., & CameronC. A. (2022). Translating mentoring interventions research into practice: Evaluation of an evidence-based workshop for research mentors on developing trainees’ scientific communication skills. PLoS ONE, 17(2): e0262418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262418
11.
DalozL. A. (2012). Mentor: Guiding the journey of adult learners. John Wiley & Sons.
12.
DoyleN., Gafni LachterL., & JacobsK. (2019). Scoping review of mentoring research in the occupational therapy literature, 2002–2018. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(5), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12579
13.
DrennanJ. & HydeA. (2008). Controlling response shift bias: The use of retrospective pre test design in the evaluation of a mater's programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773026
14.
EbyL. T., AllenT. D., HoffmanB. J., BaranikL. E., SauerJ. B., BaldwinS.et al. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protege perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 441– 476. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029279
15.
GermerothD., MurrayC. M., McMullenR. S., & BoshoffK. (2024). A scoping review of mentorship in allied health: Attributes, programs and outcomes. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 71(1), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12903
16.
HillL. G. (2020). Back to the future: Considerations in use and reporting of the retrospective pretest. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419870245
17.
HuizingR. L. (2012). Mentoring together: A literature review of group mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645599
18.
HwalekM., Solomon-FilerC., & WassermanD. (2022). Retrospective pretests: Recent use in visitor studies research and ways to make them more informative. Visitor Studies, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2021.1977084
19.
JacksonO., VilleneuveM., & MillingtonM. (2023). The experience and role of mentorship for paediatric occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 70(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12839
20.
JohnsonC. R., BrownK., HymanS. L., BrooksM. M., AponteC., LevatoL., SchmidtB., EvansV., HuoZ., BendixenR., EngH., SaxT., & SmithT. (2019). Parent training for feeding problems in children with autism spectrum disorder: Initial randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 44(2), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsy063
21.
KaasbøllJ., LassemoE., PaulsenV., MelbyL., & OsborgS. O. (2019). Foster parents’ needs, perceptions and satisfaction with foster parent training: A systematic literature review. Children and Youth Services Review, 101, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.041
22.
KingN. S., GeeB. M., SchoenS. A., & OchsenbeinM. (in press). Enhancing occupational therapy practice through a mentorship program: A qualitative study. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy.
23.
LittleT. D., ChangR., GorrallB. K., WaggenspackL., FukudaE., AllenP. J., & NoamG. G. (2020). The retrospective pretest-posttest design redux: On its validity as an alternative to traditional pretest-posttest measurement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.117/0165025419877973
24.
MarshallA. G., SistaP., ColtonK. R., FantA., KimH. S., LankP. M., & McCarthyD. M. (2019). Women's night in emergency medicine mentorship program: A SWOT analysis. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health, 21(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44433
25.
O'Brien PottM., BlanshanA. S., HunekeK. M., Baasch ThomasB. L., & CookD. A. (2021). Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: A national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02595-x
26.
PortneyL. G. (2020). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to evidence-based practice. FA Davis.
RobertsonS. C., & SavioM. C. (2003). Mentoring as professional development. OT Practice, 8(21), 12–16.
29.
RogersO., StephensonS., & BubanG. (2022). Implementation and outcomes of an education focused professional development series for occupational therapy practitioners. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2022.060319
30.
SchoenS. A., GeeB. M., & OchsenbeinM. (2021). Preparing advanced clinicians and practitioners: A model for mentorship in occupational therapy practice. Occupational Therapy International, 2021, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3394478
31.
SilvaM. A. (2021). Developing a conceptual framework for occupational therapy fellowship programs: A qualitative content analysis study. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2021.050111
32.
StockdaleA. (2012). Some further reflections by the mentor. In Mentoring and Diversity (pp.158–160). Routledge.
33.
TraubeD. E., HsiaoH. Y., RauA., Hunt-O'BrienD., LuL., & IslamN. (2020). Advancing home based parenting programs through the use of telehealth technology. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01458-w
