Enhancing global competencies in higher education: The impact of coaching technologies in Kazakhstan

Abstract

This study explores the impact of coaching technologies on developing global competencies in higher education students in Kazakhstan. Using a mixed-methods approach, 300 students were divided into an experimental group (EG), which participated in a coaching program, and a control group (CG) with a traditional curriculum. Post-intervention surveys showed the EG had higher mean scores, indicating a more positive attitude towards global competencies. Correlation analysis revealed positive relationships between understanding competencies, readiness to use coaching methods, and perceived benefits. The findings demonstrate that coaching technologies effectively enhance global competencies and suggest areas for future research.

Keywords

global competencies intercultural communication critical thinking coaching higher education

References

Abazov

(2021). Engaging in the internationalization of education and SDGs: Case study on the global hub of UNAI on sustainability. E3S Web of Conferences. 10.1051/e3sconf/202130706001.

Abdrasheva

Talenova

(2022). Internationalisation at home in a Kazakhstani technical university: Student perceptions of English-medium instruction effectiveness. International Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(8), 715–730. 10.1080/01434632.2021.1983405

Aguilar-Ferrándiz

M. E.

Toledano-Moreno

Casas-Barragán

Albornoz-Cabello

Tapia-Haro

R. M.

(2024). Implementation of a coaching training for enhancing empathy and emotional-intelligence skills in health-science students: A prospective study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 76. 10.1186/s12909-024-05076-z

Almuhsin

Soh

Ullah

(2023). Systematic Literature Review on the Effectiveness of E-Coaching in Higher Education. Creative Education, 14(5), 875–898. 10.4236/ce.2023.145057.

Anoshkova

T. A.

(2015). Implementation of global competency in higher education. Advanced Education, (3), 4–8. 10.20535/2410-8286.43743.

Bourn

(2016). Global citizenship and youth participation in Europe. Oxfam GB.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burleigh

C. L.

Kroposki

Steele

P. B.

Smith

Murray

(2023). Coaching and teaching performance in higher education: A literature review. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 12(1), 1–17. 10.1108/IJMCE-12-2021-0114

Capstick

M. K.

Harrell-Williams

L. M.

Cockrum

C. D.

West

S. L.

(2019). Exploring the effectiveness of academic coaching for academically at-risk college students. Innovative Higher Education, 44(3), 219–231. 10.1007/s10755-019-9459-1

10.

Conte

(2002). Business Coaching and the Entrepreneur: A Well-Suited Association. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 14, 123.

11.

Cook

L.A.

Smith

W.S.

Lan

W.Y.

Carpenter

(2016). The Development Of Global Competencies And Global Mindedness Through Global Education. CUP Faculty Research. 27. https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/cup_commons_faculty/27

12.

Cumming

(2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. 10.1177/0956797613504966

13.

Deardorff

D. K.

(2008). Intercultural competence: A definition, model, and implications for education abroad. In Developing intercultural competence and transformation (pp. 32–52). Routledge.

14.

Galguera

(2018). Globalization, International Organizations, and Mass Education., 15–35. 10.1007/978-3-319-91107-6_2.

15.

Guo

Zhuang

Hasan

H. M.

(2024). Global competence in higher education: A ten-year systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1404782. 10.3389/feduc.2024.1404782

16.

Hakro

A.N.

Mathew

(2020). Coaching and mentoring in higher education institutions: a case study in Oman. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(3), 307–322. 10.1108/IJMCE-05-2019-0060.

17.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Reporting and interpreting effect sizes in communication research: A primer for scholars and reviewers. Communication Education, 66(4), 439–444. 10.1080/03634523.2017.1313438

18.

Howlett

M. A.

Berro

M. A.

Abels

Bernacki

M. L.

Panter

A. T.

Greene

J. A.

(2025). Academic coaches’ perceptions of coaching students enrolled in introductory STEM courses: An exploratory study. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 55(2), 161–178. 10.1080/10790195.2025.2489336

19.

Johnson

R. B.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Turner

L. A.

(2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. 10.1177/1558689806298224

20.

Jones

Smith

H. A.

(2022). A comparative study of formal coaching and mentoring programmes in higher education. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11(2), 213–231. 10.1108/IJMCE-03-2021-0054

21.

Kairat

Altun

S. A.

(2024). Comparative study of informal mentoring in two higher education institutions (Kazakhstan and Türkiye). International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 22(1).

22.

Lakens

(2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

23.

Lawley

Linder-Pelz

(2016). Evidence of competency: Exploring coach, coachee and expert evaluations of coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 9(2), 110–128. 10.1080/17521882.2016.1186706.

24.

Lim

M. S. M.

Patel

N. S.

Shahdadpuri

(Eds.). (2024). Coaching students in higher education: A solution-focused approach to retention, performance and wellbeing. Routledge.

25.

Membrillo-Hernández

Cuervo-Bejarano

W. J.

Mejía-Manzano

L. A.

Caratozzolo

Vázquez-Villegas

(2023). Global Shared Learning Classroom Model: A Pedagogical Strategy for Sustainable Competencies Development in Higher Education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13(1). 10.3991/ijep.v13i1.36181.

26.

Milistetd

Salles

W. das N.

Backes

A.F.

Mesquita

Nascimento

J.V. do

. (2019). Learner-centered teaching in a university-based coach education: First attempts through action research inquiry. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 14(3): 294–309. 10.1177/1747954119842957.

27.

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2011, April 20). Order No. 152 “On approval of the Rules for organising the educational process on credit technology of education" (registered with the Ministry of Justice No. 6974). Astana, Kazakhstan: Author. https://skma.edu.kz/files/Magistracy-Residency-Doctorate/magistracy/npd/%E2%84%96152_%20On%20approval%20of%20the%20Rules%20for%20organizing%20the%20educational%20process%20on%20credit%20technology%20of%20education.pdf (date of access 5 February, 2025)

28.

Pechac

Slantcheva-Durst

(2021). Coaching toward completion: Academic coaching factors influencing community college student success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(3), 722–746. 10.1177/1521025119869849

29.

Republic of Kazakhstan. (2007, July 27). Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 319-III “On education" (as amended 15 March 2025). Astana, Kazakhstan: Adilet Legal Information System. https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z070000319_ (date of access 5 February, 2025)

30.

Rodrigues

F. P.

(2021). The Wheel of Competencies to Enhance Student-Teacher Role Awareness in Teaching-Learning Processes: The Use of a Classical Coaching Tool in Education. In Coaching Applications and Effectiveness in Higher Education (pp. 48–77). IGI Global.

31.

Rozzo

A. C.

(2025). Exploring lecturers’ goal-setting using a coaching framework. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 23(1), 346–359. 10.24384/2vxd-q756

32.

Sagintayeva

Kurakbayev

(2015). Understanding the transition of public universities to institutional autonomy in Kazakhstan. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 197–210. 10.1080/21568235.2014.967794

33.

Sarsenbayeva

Zhumabayeva

Yessenova

Ismailova

(2024). The Impact of Coaching on Development of Transversal Skills: An Exploratory Study of Teacher Candidates in Kazakhstani Primary Education. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(2), 121–135. 10.46303/jcsr.2024.14

34.

Scheunpflug

(2010). Global education and cross-cultural learning: A challenge for a research-based approach to international teacher education. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 3(3). 10.18546/IJDEGL.03.3.03.

35.

Scheunpflug

(2020). Evidence and efficacy: A compulsion for global education. The Bloomsbury Handbook of Global Education and Learning, 40–51. Retrieved from http://digital.casalini.it/9781350108745 (date of access: 6 February, 2024).

36.

Slabbert

Hoole

(2021). A competency framework for coaches working in coaching development centres. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47(1), 1–10. 10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1841.

37.

Spring

(2008). Research on Globalization and Education. Review of Educational Research, 78, 330–363. 10.3102/0034654308317846.

38.

Taie

(2011). Coaching as an Approach to Enhance Performance. Journal for Quality and Participation, 34.

39.

Tajik

M. A.

Namyssova

Shamatov

Manan

S. A.

Antwi

S. K.

(2023). Navigating the potentials and barriers to EMI in the post-Soviet region: Insights from Kazakhstani university students and instructors. International Journal of Multilingualism. Advance online publication. 10.1080/14790718.2023.2265428

40.

Terblanche

N.H.D.

(2020). The coaching model derivation process: combining grounded theory and canonical action research for developing coaching models, Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 13(1), 45–60. 10.1080/17521882.2019.1619794.

41.

Thomson

(2018). Coaching in higher education: A case study. In Coaching in Education (pp. 205–214). Routledge.

42.

van der Baan

Gast

Gijselaers

Beausaert

(2022). Coaching to prepare students for their school-to-work transition: Conceptualising core coaching competences. Education + Training, 64(3), 398–415. 10.1108/ET-11-2020-0341

43.

van Nieuwerburgh

Tong

(2013). Exploring the benefits of being a student coach in educational settings: A mixed-method study. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 6(1), 5–24. 10.1080/17521882.2012.734318

44.

Wallace

Zaccaro

Hedrick

(2020). Coaching Leaders for Continuous Learning. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197506707.013.12.

45.

Whitmore

(2010). Coaching for Performance - Growing Human Potential and Purpose (4th Edition). NHRD Network Journal, 3, 83–84. 10.1177/0974173920100216.