An experiment that investigated the interaction effect of Neuroticism and the comparison to different reference groups on self-estimates of intelligence is reported. University students (100 men, 15 women) were randomly assigned to two experimental groups and asked to rate their own intelligence on a one-item measure, in IQ points, having been provided with reference values for either the general population or a student sample. Analysis of data confirmed that the accuracy of self-estimates of intelligence was influenced by the variation of the instruction. Participants provided more accurate estimations when confronted with comparison information about fellow students than about the general population. Persons scoring high on Neuroticism estimated their intelligence lower, but only when their estimation was based on a general reference group. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. L.WolmanS. D. (2007) Determinants and validity of self-estimates of abilities and self-concept measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 57–78.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, London: Sage.
3.
AsendorpfJ. B. (2004) Psychologie der Persönlichkeit. [Personality psychology]Heidelberg: Springer.
4.
CattellR. (2008) Measuring intelligence with the culture fair tests: manual.Oxford, UK: Hogrefe.
5.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.ArtecheA. (2008) Intellectual competence and academic performance: preliminary validation of a model. Intelligence, 36, 564–573.
6.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2004) A possible model for understanding the personality-intelligence interface. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 249–264.
7.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2006) A self-assessed intelligence and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 26, 769–779.
8.
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. A. (2003) A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and self-handicapping. Journal of Personality, 71, 233–249.
9.
FurnhamA. (2004) Are lay people lumpers or splitters? The factor structure of, and sex differences related to, self-rated and other-rated abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 153–168.
FurnhamA.BuchananT. (2005) Personality, gender and self-perceived intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 543–555.
12.
FurnhamA.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2004) Estimating one's own personality and intelligence score. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 149–160.
13.
FurnhamA.MoutafiJ.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2005) Personality and intelligence: gender, the Big Five, self-estimated, and psychometric intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 11–24.
14.
FurnhamA.von StummS.MakendrayogamA.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2009) A taxonomy of self-estimated human performance. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 188–193.
15.
HoekstraH.OrmelH.de FruytF. (2007) NEO-PI–R en NEO-FFI: Big Five persoonlijkheidstests: test manual [NEO-PI–R and NEO-FFI: Big Five Personality Inventories: test manual].Amsterdam: Hogrefe.
16.
HollingH.PreckelF. (2005) Self-estimates of intelligence: methodological approaches and gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 503–517.
17.
MabeP. A. I.WestS. A. (1982) Validity of self-evaluation of ability: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280–296.
18.
MarshH. W. (2007) Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: the role of self-concept in educational psychology.Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
19.
MatthewsG.DaviesD. R.WestermanS. J.StammersR. B. (2000) Human performance: cognition, stress, and individual differences.Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
20.
PaulhusD. L.LysyD. C.YikM. S. M. (1998) Self-report measure of intelligence: are they useful as proxy IQ tests?Journal of Personality, 66, 525–554.
21.
StiegerS.KastnerC. K.VoracekM.von StummS.Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2010) Independent effects of personality and sex on self-estimated intelligence: evidence from Austria. Psychological Reports, 107, 553–563.
22.
TettR. P.BurnettD.D. (2003) A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.
23.
VisserB. A.AshtonM. C.VernonP. A. (2008) What makes you think you're so smart? Measured abilities, personality, and sex differences in relation to self-estimates of multiple intelligences. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 35–44.
24.
WeißR. (1971) Grundintelligenztest CFT3 Skala 3: Handanweisung. [Culture Fair Intelligence Test CFT3 Scale 3: manual]Braunschweig: Georg Westermann.
