The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) as tools to intimidate, harass, and control the partner has been, so far, little studied in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the extension and sex differences of victimization of cyber dating abuse, as well as the context in which it occurs, and its relationship with offline psychological and physical aggressions. The sample consisted of 433 college students ages 18 to 30 years. The results showed that over 50% of the participants had been victims of some type of cyber dating abuse in the last six months. The most common behavior was the use of ICT to control the partner. Also, victims of cyber dating abuse were victimized repeatedly, an average of 23 times in the last six months. The data also showed that cyber dating abuse appear usually in a context of jealousy. Finally, the results revealed a significant relationship between cyber dating abuse and offline psychological dating aggressions. Limitations and future lines of research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmendrosC.Gámez-GuadixM.CarroblesJ. A.Rodríguez-CarballeiraÁ.PorrúaC. (2009) Abuso psicológico en la pareja: Aportaciones recientes, concepto y medición [Psychological abuse in couples: Recent contributions, concept and measurement]. Psicología Conductual, 17, 433–451.
2.
ArcherJ. (2000) Sex differences in physical aggression to partners: A reply to Frieze (2000), O'Leary (2000), and White, Smith, Koss, and Figueredo (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 697.
3.
BanyardV. L.CrossC. (2008) Consequences of teen dating violence: Understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women, 14, 998–1013.
4.
BarlettC. P.GentileD. A. (2012) Attacking others online. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 123–135.
5.
BjörkqvistK. (1994) Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177–188.
6.
BonomiA. E.AndersonM. L.NemethJ.Bartle-HaringS.BuettnerC.SchipperD. (2012) Daring violence victimization across the teen years: Abuse frequency, number of abusive partners, and age at first occurrence. BMC Public Health, 12, 637–646.
7.
BuesaS.CalveteE. (2011) Adaptación de la escala de abuso psicológico sutil y manifiesto a las mujeres en muestra clínica y de la comunidad [Adaptation of the subtle and overt psychological abuse of women scale in clinical and community samples]. Anales de Psicología, 27, 774–782.
8.
BurkeS. C.WallenM.Vail-SmithK.KnoxD. (2011) Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1162–1167.
9.
CardN. A.StuckyB. D.SawalaniG. M.LittleT. D. (2008) Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229.
10.
ChristofidesE.MuiseA.DesmaraisS. (2009) Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?Cyber-Psychology & Behavior, 12(3), 341–345.
11.
CorralS.CalveteE. (2006) Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja mediante las Escalas de Tácticas para Conflictos: Estructura factorial y diferencias de género en jóvenes [Assessment of violence in intimate relationships through “Conflict Tactics Scales”: Factorial structure and gender differences in young]. Psicología Conductual, 2, 215–234.
12.
CutbushS.WilliamsJ.MillerS.GibbsD.Clinton-SherrodM. (2012) Electronic dating aggression among middle school students: Demographic correlates and associations with other types of violence. Poster presented at the American Public Health Association, Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, October 27–31. Pp. 27–31.
13.
DankM.LachmanP.ZweigJ.YahnerJ. (2014) Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 43, 846–857.
14.
David-FerdonC.HertzM. F. (2007) Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S1–S5.
15.
DesmaraisS. L.ReevesK. A.NichollsT. L.TelfordR. P.FiebertM. S. (2012) Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships (Parts 1 and 2): Rates of male and female perpetration. Partner Abuse, 3, 140–198.
16.
DimondJ. P.FieslerC.BruckmanA. S. (2011) Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers, 23, 413–421.
17.
DrauckerC. B.MartsolfD. S. (2010) The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 133–142.
18.
EshelmanL.LevendoskyA. A. (2012) Dating violence: Mental health consequences based on type of abuse. Violence and Victims, 27, 215–228.
19.
EstévezA.VillardónL.CalveteE.PadillaP.OrueI. (2010) Adolescentes víctimas de cyberbullying: Prevalencia y characterísticas [Adolescent victims of cyberbullying: Prevalence and characteristics]. Psicología Conductual, 18, 73–89.
20.
Fernández-FuertesA. A.FuertesA. (2010) Physical and psychological aggression in dating relationships of Spanish adolescents: Motives and consequences. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 183–191.
21.
FiebertM. S. (2014) References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An updated annotated bibliography. Sexuality & Culture, 18, 405–467.
22.
FinnJ. (2004) A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 468–483.
23.
FollingstadD. R. (2007) Rethinking current approaches to psychological abuse: Conceptual and methodological issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 439–458.
24.
FollingstadD. R.EdmundsonM. (2010) Is psychological abuse reciprocal in intimate relationships? Data from a national sample of American adults. Journal of Violence, 25, 495–508.
25.
FritzP. (2006) Attributions for partner aggression in specific incidents of aggression. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66(9-B), 5086.
26.
Gámez-GuadixM.OrueI.SmithP. K.CalveteE. (2013) Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic Internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 446–452.
27.
HambyS. (2014) Intimate partner and sexual violence research: Scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15, 149–158.
28.
HarnedM. S. (2001) Abused women or abused men? An examination of the context and outcomes of dating violence. Violence and Victims, 16, 269–285.
29.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2011) Electronic dating violence: A brief for educators and parents. Cyberbullying Research Center. Retrieved from www.cyberbullying.us.
30.
HinesD. A.SaudinoK. J. (2003) Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence and Victims, 18(2), 197–217.
31.
JaishankarK.SankaryV. U. (2006) Cyber stalking: A global menace in the information super highway. Paper presented at the 29th All Indian Criminology Conference, Madurai Kamaraj Univer., Madurai, India, February 16–18. Retrieved from http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/maheu/all-about-cyber-stalking/.
32.
King-RiesA. (2011) Teens, technology, and cyberstalking: The domestic violence wave of the future?Texas Journal of Women and the Law, 20, 131–193.
33.
KiriakidisS. P.KavouraS. P. (2010) Cyberbullying: A review of the literature on harassment through the Internet and other electronic means. Family & Community Health, 33, 82.
34.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2007) Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30.
35.
LeenE.SorbringE.MawerM.HoldsworthE.HelsingB.BowenE. (2013) Prevalence, dynamic risk factors and the efficacy of primary interventions for adolescent dating violence: An international review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 159–174.
36.
LyndonA.Bonds-RaackeJ.CrattyA. D. (2011) College students' Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 711–716.
37.
MarquartB. S.NanniniD. K.EdwardsR. W.SatanleyL. R.WaymanJ. C. (2007) Prevalence of dating violence victimization: Regional and gender differences. Adolescence, 42, 645–657.
38.
MarshallT. (2012) Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: Associations with post-breakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 10, 521–526.
39.
MelanderL. A. (2010) College students' perceptions of intimate partner cyber harassment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 263–268.
40.
Muñoz-RivasM. J.GrañaJ. L.O'LearyK. D.GonzálezM. P. (2007) Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 298–304.
SchnurrM. P.MahatmyaD.BascheR. A. (2013) The role of dominance, cyber aggression perpetration, and gender on emerging adults' perpetration of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 1, 70–83.
ShortE.McMurrayI. (2009) Mobile phone harassment: An exploration of students' perceptions of intrusive texting behavior. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 5, 163–180.
48.
SmithP. K. (2012) Cyberbullying and cyber aggression. In JimersonS. R.NickersonA. B.MayerM. J.FurlongM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice. (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge. Pp. 93–103.
49.
StetsJ. E.StrausM. A. (1989) The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 161–180.
50.
StrausM. A. (2004) Prevalence of violence against partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790–811.
51.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996) The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.
52.
StrausM. A.RamirezI. L. (2007) Gender symmetry in prevalence, severity, and chronicity of physical aggression against dating partners by university students in Mexico and USA. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 281–290.
53.
SundayS.KlineM.LabrunaV.PelcovitzD.SalzingerS.KaplanS. (2011) The role of adolescent physical abuse in adult intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3773–3789.
54.
SwahnM. H.AlemdarM.WhitakerD. J. (2010) Nonreciprocal and reciprocal dating violence and injury occurrence among urban youth. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11, 264–268.
55.
TetenA. L.BallB.ValleL. A.NoonanR.RosenbluthB. (2009) Considerations for the definition, measurement, consequences, and prevention of dating violence victimization among adolescent girls. Journal of Women's Health, 18, 923–927.
56.
TokunagaR. S. (2011) Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705–713.
57.
Wolitzky-TaylorK. B.RuggieroK. J.DanielsonC.ResnickH. S.HansonR. F.SmithD. W.KilpatrickD. G. (2008) Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 755–762.
58.
ZweigJ. M.DankM.YahnerJ.LachmanP. (2013) The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–15.
