Over the years, various studies addressing different populations have consistently raised concerns about the unidimensionality of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. In the present study, the factorial structure of the scale was examined by comparing it to alternative models. In a sample of 1,157 French Canadian teachers, results of confirmatory factor analysis support a three-factor model solution. Support for the invariance of this model across sexes and teaching levels (i.e., elementary and high school) was also obtained.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsG. R.OpenshawD. K.BennionL.MillsT., & NobleS. (1988) Loneliness in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3, 81–96.
2.
AllenR. L., & OshaganH. (1995) The UCLA Loneliness Scale: invariance of social structural characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 185–195.
3.
AustinB. A. (1983) Factorial structure of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Psychological Reports, 53, 883–889.
4.
BentlerP. M. (1990) Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
5.
BentlerP. M., & WuE. J. C. (1995) EQS for Windows user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
6.
BrowneM. W., & CudeckR. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A. & LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 445–455.
7.
CheungG. W., & RensvoldR. B. (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
8.
CuffelB. J., & AkamatsuT. J. (1989) The structure of loneliness: a factor analytic investigation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 459–474.
9.
De GrâceG-R.JoshiP., & PelletierR. (1993) L'Échelle de solitude de l'Université Laval (ÉSUL): validation canadienne-française du UCLA Loneliness Scale. Revue Canadienne des Science du Comportement, 25, 13–27.
10.
DussaultM., & DeaudelinC. (2001) Loneliness and self-efficacy in preservice teachers. Psychological Reports, 89, 285–289.
11.
DussaultM.DeaudelinC.RoyerN., & LoiselleJ. (1999) Professional isolation and stress in teachers. Psychological Reports, 84, 943–946.
12.
DussaultM., & ThibodeauS. (1997) Professional isolation and performance at work of school principals. Journal of School Leadership, 7, 521–536.
13.
HartshoreT. S. (1993) Psychometric properties and confirmatory analysis of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 182–195.
14.
HawkleyL. C.BrowneM. W., & CacioppoJ. T. (2005) How can I connect with thee?Psychological Science, 16, 798–804.
15.
HaysR. D., & DiMatteoM. R. (1987) A short-form measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 69–81.
16.
HojatM. (1982) Psychometric characteristics of the UCLA Loneliness Scale: a study with Iranian college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 917–925.
17.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
18.
HughesM. E.WaiteL. J.HawkleyL. C., & CacioppoJ. T. (2004) A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys. Research on Aging, 26, 655–672.
19.
KnightR. G.ChisholmB. J.MarshN. V., & GodfreyH. P. (1988) Some normative reliability, and factor analytic data for the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 203–206.
20.
MarshH. W.HauK-T., & GraysonD. (2005) Goodness-of-fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In Maydeu-OlivaresA. & McArdleJ. (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: a festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 275–340.
21.
RotenbergK. J.ShewchukV-A., & KimberleyT. (2001) Loneliness, sex, romantic jealousy, and powerlessness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 55–79.
22.
RussellD.PeplauL. A., & CutronaC. E. (1980) The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.
23.
SchumackerR. E., & LomaxR. (1996) A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
SmithS. C., & ScottJ. J. (1990) The collaborative school: a work environment for effective instruction.Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
25.
WilsonD.CuttsJ.LeesI.MapungwanaS., & MaunganidzeL. (1992) Psychometric properties of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale and two short-form measures of loneliness in Zimbabwe. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 72–81.
26.
ZakahiW. R., & DuranR. L. (1982) All the lonely people: the relationship among loneliness, communicative competence, and communication anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 30, 203–209.