That different amplitudes of muscle activities during various abdominal exercises not only reflect the inherent differences in motor control but movement speed as well was hypothesized. 20 healthy adults (M age = 23 yr.) performed three exercises that involved varying amounts of trunk control: the partial sit-up, full sit-up, and AbSlide roll. Covariate analyses indicated that the amplitude of muscle activities could be partitioned into three categories: motor control and scaling (speed and amplitude), scaling only, and motor control only. Overall, the AbSlide exercise activated the most amount of muscular activity, followed by the full and partial sit-up exercises. Results are discussed in terms of how the various muscles contribute to motor control and velocity scaling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbSlide: exercise and healthy eating guide. Los Angeles, CA: Slymark, Inc.
2.
BaxterR. E.MooreJ. H.PendergrassT. L.CrowderT. A., & LynchS. (2003) Improvement in sit-up performance associated with 2 different training regimens. Journal of Orthopedic Sports and Physical Therapy, 33(1), 40–47.
3.
ChongR. K. Y.AmbroseA.CarzoliJ.HardisonL., & JacobsonB. (2001) Source of improvement in balance control after a training program for ankle proprioception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 265–272.
4.
ChongR. K. Y., & FranklinM. E. (2001) Initial evidence for the mixing and soft assembly of the ankle, suspensory and hip muscle patterns. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 250–255.
5.
CordoP. J., & GurfinkelV. S. (2004) Motor coordination can be fully understood only by studying complex movements. Progress in Brain Research, 143, 29–38.
6.
CordoP. J.GurfinkelV. S.SmithT. C.HodgesP. W.VerschuerenS. M., & BrumagneS. (2003) The sit-up: complex kinematics and muscle activity in voluntary axial movement. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 13, 239–252.
7.
CordoP. J.HodgesP. W.SmithT. C.BrumagneS., & GurfinkelV. S. (2006) Scaling and non-scaling of muscle activity, kinematics, and dynamics in sit-ups with different degrees of difficulty. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, in press.
8.
DienerH. C.HorakF. B., & NashnerL. M. (1988) Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 59, 1888–1905.
9.
GodfreyK. E.KindigL. E., & WindellE. J. (1977) Electromyographic study of duration of muscle activity in sit-up variations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 58, 132–135.
10.
GottliebG. L.CorcosD. M., & AgarwalG. C. (1989) Organizing principles for single-joint movements: I. A speed-insensitive strategy. Journal of Neurophysiology, 62, 342–357.
11.
GottliebG. L.CorcosD. M.AgarwalG. C., & LatashM. L. (1990) Organizing principles for single joint movements: III. Speed-insensitive strategy as a default. Journal of Neurophysiology, 63, 625–636.
12.
HorakF. B.FrankJ., & NuttJ. (1996) Effects of dopamine on postural control in Parkinson subjects: scaling, set and tone. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75(6), 2380–2396.
13.
HorakF. B., & MooreS. P. (1993) The effect of prior learning on human postural responses. Gait and Posture, 1, 203–210.
14.
JensenJ. L.PhillipsS. J., & ClarkJ. E. (1994) For young jumpers, differences are in the movement's control, not its coordination. Research Quarterly in Exercise and Sport, 65, 258–268.
15.
JukerD.McGillS.KropfP., & SteffenT. (1998) Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of lumbar portions of psoas and the abdominal wall during a wide variety of tasks. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30, 301–310.
16.
KeeleS. W. (1981) Behavioral analysis of movement. In BrookhartJ. M. & MountcastleV. B. (Eds.), Handbook of physiology, Section 1: The nervous system. Vol. II. Bethesda, MD: American Physiology Association. Pp. 1391–1414.
17.
LaPierT. K.CreelmanJ.CunninghamD.MooreJ., & WhilesJ. (2000) Abdominal muscle EMG activity during trunk flexion exercises: partial sit-up vs. ab roller curl-up. Physiotherapy Canada, 52, 158–162.
18.
LatashL. P.LatashM. L., & MeijerO. G. (2000) 30 years later: on the problem of the relation between structure and function in the brain from a contemporary viewpoint (1996): Part II. Motor Control, 4, 125–149.
19.
MichelV, & ChongR. K. (2004) The strategies to regulate and to modulate the propulsive forces during gait initiation in lower limb amputees. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 356–365.
20.
PieringA. W.JanowskiA. P.MooreM. T.SnyderA. C., & WehrenbergW. B. (1993) Electromyographic analysis of four popular abdominal exercises. Journal of Athletic Training, 28, 120–126.
21.
SafritM. J.ZhuW.CostaM. G., & ZhangL. (1992) The difficulty of sit-ups tests: an empirical investigation. Research Quarterly in Exercise and Sport, 63, 277–283.
22.
SerrienD. J.SteyversM.DebaereF.StelmachG. E., & SwinnenS. P. (2000) Bimanual coordination and limb-specific parameterization in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1714–1722.
23.
SkossR.CordoP.SmithT., & GurfinkelV. (2003) Do axial movements scale with speed?Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 272, No. 217.
24.
SzaszA.ZimmermanA.FreyE.BradyD., & SpallettaR. (2002) An electromyographical evaluation of the validity of the 2-minute sit-up section of the Army Physical Fitness Test in measuring abdominal strength and endurance. Military Medicine, 167, 950–953.
25.
WardenS. J.WajswelnerH., & BennellK. L. (1999) Comparison of Abshaper and conventionally performed abdominal exercises using surface electromyography. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, 1656–1664.
