Measurement of Discrimination of Separation in Elderly Persons Using a Liquid-Crystal Display and Grating Method

Abstract

This study analyzed psychophysical data from younger and elderly people on the influence of spacing between vertical lines, exposure time, and number of vertical lines in a stimulus for visual performance. A total of 50 elderly people and 31 graduate students participated in the experiment. Nine levels of spacing between lines (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 29 points), three exposure times (0.2, 0.6, and 1.0 sec.), and five sets of numbers of lines (4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) were manipulated. Analysis showed enhanced spacing between lines and exposure time improved discrimination of separation. However, although performance on discrimination of separation increased as spacing between lines increased up to 21 points, it was degraded at higher values. A positive effect of number of lines on discrimination of separation was also observed, and performance increased as the number of lines decreased. The effect of age group, i.e., elderly versus younger, on performance was significant. The accuracy of the younger was greater than that for the elderly group. Moreover, three interactive two-way effects were found: group × spacing between lines, number of lines × spacing between lines, and number of lines × exposure time. The present findings could be used as a practical reference in the design of instrument displays in which the operator has to consider the scale and markings on a dial, especially if the display is operated in an emergency or is manipulated by elderly people.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attwood

D. A.

Deeb

J. M.

, & Danz-Reece

(2004) Ergonomic solutions for the process industries. Boston, MA: Elsevier.

Beard

Yager

, & Neufeld

(1994) Contrast detection and discrimination in young and older adults. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 783–791.

Boyce

P. R.

(1997) Illumination. In Salvendy

(Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. New York: Wiley. Pp. 859–863.

Boyce

P. R.

(2001) Illumination: basic definition. In Karwowski

(Ed.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. Vol II. New York: Taylor & Francis. Pp. 1016–1021.

Boyce

P. R.

(2003) Human factors in lighting. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Craik

F. I. M.

, & Salehouse

T. A.

(2000) The handbook of aging and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior. (2005) [Population by age in Taiwan-Fuchien Area]. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C.

Derrington

A. M.

, & Fuchs

A. F.

(1981) The development of spatial-frequency selectivity in kitten striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 316, 1–10.

Evans

, & Ginsberg

A. P.

(1985) Contrast sensitivity predicts age-related differences in highway sign discriminability. Human Factors, 17, 637–642.

10.

Fisk

A. D.

Rogers

W. A.

Charness

Czaja

S. J.

, & Sharit

(2004) Designing for older adult: principles and creative human factors approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

11.

Huang

F. S.

(2004) [Adult learning]. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book, Inc. [in Chinese]

12.

Kroemer

K. H. E.

Kroemer

H. B.

, & Kroemer-Elbert

K. E.

(2001) Ergonomics: how to design for ease and efficiency. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

13.

Owsley

Sekuler

, & Siemsen

(1983) Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Research, 23, 689–699.

14.

Owsley

, & Sloane

N. E.

(1987) Contrast sensitivity, acuity and the perception of “real world” targets. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 71, 791–796.

15.

Regan

(2000) Human perception of objects: early visual processing of spatial form defined by luminance, color, texture, motion, and binocular disparity. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc.

16.

Regan

, & Beverley

K. I.

(1983) Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity and by relative sensitivity to different orientations. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science, 24, 754–759.

17.

Sekuler

Kline

, & Dismukes

(1982) Aging and human visual function. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.

18.

Tiippana

Rovamo

Nasanen

Whitaker

, & Makela

(2000) Contrast matching across spatial frequencies for isoluminant chromatic gratings. Vision Research, 40, 2159–2165.

19.

Tulunay-Keesey

Ver Hoeve , & Terkla-McGrane

(1988) Threshold and supra-threshold spatiotemporal response throughout adulthood. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 219–220.

20.

Watt

R. J.

, & Morgan

M. J.

(1983) Mechanisms responsible for the assessment of visual location: theory and evidence. Vision Research, 23, 97–109.

21.

Wickens

C. D.

Lee

Liu

, & Becker

S. G.

(2004) An introduction to human factors engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

22.

Wright

, & Rea

(1984) Age, a human factor in lighting. In Attwood

& McCann

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 1984 International Conference on Occupational Ergonomics. Rexdale, Ont., Can: Human Factors Association of Canada. Pp. 508–512.