This preliminary study explored the use of highly realistic 3-dimensional body-scan images as a potential tool, taking advantage of a much more specific and expanded representation of the entire body. Traditionally, body-image research makes use of various contour drawing scales whose 2-dimensional figures increase proportionately and do not match the shape of many women. The study tested whether body-scanned images (N = 85) could be consistently “matched” to individual figures on a contour drawing scale. Internal consistency and interrater reliability were calculated and high coefficients were observed (α =.97, κ =.80). The potential of utilizing 3-dimensional images either as more realistic somatotypes in contour-rating scales or as a measurement of body-image satisfaction using computer manipulation of a digital image is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambrosi-RandicN.Pokrajac-BulianA.TaksicV. (2005) Nine, seven, five, or three: How many figures do we need for assessing body image?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 488–492.
2.
BeebeD. W.HolmbeckG. N.GrzeskiewiczC. (1999) Normative and psychometric data on the Body Image Assessment-Revised. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 374–394.
3.
Byrd-BredbennerC.MurrayJ.SchlusselY. R. (2005) Temporal changes in anthropometric measurements of idealized females and young women in general. Women & Health, 41, 13–30.
4.
CameronE. M.FerraroF. R. (2004) Body satisfaction in college women after brief exposure to magazine images. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1093–1099.
5.
CollinsM. E. (1991) Body figure perceptions and preferences among preadolescent children. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 10, 199–208.
6.
CountsC. R.AdamsH. E. (1985) Body image in bulimic, dieting and normal females. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 7, 289–300.
7.
DevarajanP.IstookC. (2004) Validation of Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for apparel software. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 4, 1–16.
8.
FallonA.RozinP. (1985) Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 102–105.
9.
FingeretM. C.GleavesD. H.PearsonC. A. (2004) On the methodology of body image assessment: The use of figural rating scales to evaluate body dissatisfaction and the ideal body standards of women. Body Image, 1, 207–212.
10.
GardnerR. M.BoiceR. (2004) A computer program for measuring body-size distortion and body dissatisfaction. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 89–95.
11.
GardnerR. M.StarkK.JacksonN. A.FriedmanB. N. (1999) Development and validation of two new scales for assessment of body image. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 981–993.
12.
GleavesD. H.Cepeda-BenitoA.WilliamsT. A.CororveM. E. (2000) Body-image preferences of self and others: A comparison of Spanish and American male and female college students. Eating Disorders, 8, 269–282.
13.
HolderM. D.KeatesJ. (2006) Size of drawing influences body size estimates by women with and without eating concerns. Body Image, 3, 77–86.
14.
ParkS. (2005) The influence of presumed media influence on women's desire to be thin. Communication Research, 32, 594–614.
15.
RandC. S.WrightB. A. (2000) Continuity and change in the evaluation of ideal and acceptable body sizes across a wide age span. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 90–100.
16.
RoyJ. L.HunterG. R.BlaudeauT. E. (2006) Percent body fat is related to body-shape perception and dissatisfaction in students attending an all women's college. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 677–684.
17.
RuddN. A.LennonS. J. (2000) Body image and appearance-management behaviors in college women. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 18, 152–162.
18.
SandsR.ArmatasC. (2004) Measurement of body image satisfaction using computer manipulation of a digital image. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 325–337.
19.
SherblomP. R.RustD. M. (2004) Body image, figure rating, and Body Mass Index of girls enrolled in health, physical education, or athletics classes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 473–482.
20.
SimmonsK.IstookC. L.DevarajanP. (2004) Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for apparel: Part II. Development of shape-sorting software. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 4, 17–40.
21.
StunkardA. J.SorensonT. I.SchulsingerF. (1983) Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. In KetyS.RowlandL. P.SidmanR. L.MatthysseS. W. (Eds.), The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders. New York: Raven Press. Pp. 115–120.
22.
ThompsonM. A.GrayJ. J. (1995) Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 258–269.
23.
TiggemannM.Wilson-BarrettE. (1998) Children's figure ratings: Relationship to self-esteem and negative stereotyping. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 23, 83–88.
24.
TrubyH.PaxtonS. J. (2002) Development of the Children's Body Image Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 185–203.
25.
VoracekM.FisherM. L. (2002) Shapely centerfolds? Temporal changes in body measurements: Trend analysis. British Medical Journal, 325, 1447–1448.
26.
WebsterJ.TiggemannM. (2003) The relationship between women's body satisfaction and self-image across the life span: The role of cognitive control. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 241–252.
27.
WertheimE. H.PaxtonS. J.TilgnerL. (2004) Test-retest reliability and construct validity of Contour Drawing Rating Scale scores in a sample of early adolescent girls. Body Image, 1, 199–205.
28.
WilliamsonD. A.GleavesD. H.WatkinsP. C.SchlundtD. G. (1993) Validation of self-ideal body size discrepancy as a measure of body dissatisfaction. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 57–68.
29.
WisemanC. V.GrayJ. J.MosimannJ. E.AhrensA. H. (1992) Cultural expectations of thinness in women: An update. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 85–89.
