Dombrose and Slobin's Photo-Analysis Test and new similar test were administered to 18- and 19-yr.-old, first-year university students. Dombrose and Slobin's test did not differentiate in the predicted direction on any of the three variables. The new test differentiated significantly in the predicted direction on the impulse and ego variables but not on the superego variable.
References
1.
BeierE. G.IzardC. E.SmockC. D.TougasR. R.Response to the human face as a standard stimulus. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 126–131.
2.
BennettE. M.CohenL. R.Men and women: Personality patterns and contrasts. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1959, 59, 101–155.
3.
BlumG. S.A study of the psychoanalytic theory of psychosexual development. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1949, 39, 3–99.
4.
BuzbyD. E.The interpretation of facial expression. Amer. J. Psychol., 1924, 35, 602–604.
5.
CharnesG.The relative strengths of impulse, ego, and superego in latency, adolescence, and adulthood. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve Univer., 1953.
6.
DombroseL. A.SlobinM. S.An approach to the measurement of relative strengths of impulse, ego, and superego, and the determination of the effects of impulses and superego upon ego functions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve Univer., 1951.
GoldenD.Manifestations of impulse, ego, and superego in elementary school boys and girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Reserve Univer., 1954.
9.
SchoeppeA.Sex differences in adolescent socialization. J. soc. Psychol., 1953, 38, 175–185.
10.
SearsP. S.Doll play aggression in normal young children: Influence of sex, age, sibling status, father's absence. Psychol. Monogr., 1951, 65, No. 6 (Whole No. 323).
11.
TaftR.The ability to judge people. Psychol. Bull., 1955, 52, 1–23.
