Overconstancy in Distance Perception as a Function of the Texture of the Stimulus Field and other Variables

Abstract

The primary aim of this investigation, inspired in part by Gibson's theory of space perception, was to study changes in distance bisections over short distances (up to 150 cm. from S) as a function of the texture of the stimulus field. The latter was systematically varied along two dimensions: the density of the texture elements and the degree of patterning in the arrangement of these elements. Panels constructed to represent these textures served as a ground over which the distance bisections were made; they were displayed in a brightly lit viewing box. A consistent bias of overconstancy was found for all textures (including a blank panel); the texture variable affected the judgments only to a very slight degree. Overconstancy rose markedly as a function of S's exposure to the task. Two subsidiary experiments showed no difference between binocular and monocular viewing, but substantial reduction in overconstancy when S's viewing height was increased The results were interpreted as reflecting the operation of a judgmental bias developing as S's perceptual frame of reference became stabilized; this frame of reference appears to operate in relative independence of stimulus variables such as those emphasized by Gibson.

References

Adams

J. S.

A study of the perception of surface slant. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of North Carolina, 1957.

Beck

Texture-gradients and judgments of slant and recession. Amer. J. Psychol., 1960, 73, 411–416.

Carlson

V. R.

Overestimation in size-constancy judgments. Amer. J. Psychol., 1960, 73, 199–213.

Carlson

V. R.

Size-constancy judgments and perceptual compromise. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 68–73.

Chalmers

E. L.

Monocular and binocular cues in the perception of size and distance. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 415–423.

Clark

W. C.

Smith

A. H.

Rabe

Retinal gradients of outline distortion and binocular disparity as stimuli for slant. Canad. J. Psychol., 1956, 10, 77–82. (a).

Clark

W. C.

Smith

A. H.

Rabe

The interaction of surface texture, outline and ground in the perception of slant. Canad. J. Psychol., 1956, 10, 1–8. (b).

Denis-Prinzhorn

Perception des distances et constance des grandeurs (etude genetique). Arch. Psychol., Geneve, 1960, 37, 181–309.

Edwards

A. L.

Experimental design in psychological research. (Rev. ed.) New York: Rinehart, 1960.

10.

Gibson

J. J.

The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1950.

11.

Gibson

J. J.

Perception as a function of stimulation. In Koch

(Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. Vol. I. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 456–501.

12.

Gibson

J. J.

Purdy

Lawrence

A method of controlling stimulation for the study of space perception: The optical tunnel. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 50, 1–14.

13.

Gruber

H. E.

The relation of perceived size to perceived distance. Amer. J. Psychol., 1954, 67, 411–426.

14.

Gruber

H. E.

Clark

W. C.

Perception of slanted surfaces. Percept. mot. Skills. 1956, 6, 97–106.

15.

Holway

A. H.

Boring

E. G.

Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. Amer. J. Psychol., 1941, 54, 21–37.

16.

Porter

P. B.

A gradient theory of spatial vision. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1962, 93, 751–760.

17.

Smith

O. W.

Judgments of size and distance in photographs. Amer. J. Psychol., 1958, 71, 529–538.

18.

Smith

O. W.

Smith

P. C.

Interaction of the effects of cues involved in judgments of curvature. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 361–375.

19.

Smith

P. C.

Smith

O. W.

Ball throwing responses to photographically portrayed targets. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 62, 223–233. (a).

20.

Smith

P. C.

Smith

O. W.

Veridical perception of cylindricality: A problem of depth discrimination and object identification. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 62, 145–152. (b).

21.

Tada

Overestimation of farther distance in depth perception. Jap. J. Psychol., 1956, 27, 204–208.

22.

Taylor

J. G.

The behavioral basis of perception. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1962.

23.

Weinstein

The perception of depth in the absence of the texture gradient. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 611–615.

24.

Whitehouse

J. M.

Gruber

H. E.

The effects of surface-texture and binocular disparity on distance-ratio perception. Paper read at Colorado Psychol. Assn, Fort Collins, 1957.

25.

Wohlwill

J. F.

The perspective illusion: Perceived size and distance in fields varying in suggested depth, in children and adults. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 300–310.

26.

Wohlwill

J. F.

The development of overconstancy in space perception. In Lipsitt

Spiker

(Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior. Vol. I. New York: Academic Press, in press.