Since certain curvature aftereffects require active movements during prismatic adaptation, non-visual components must affect some (but not all) visual shape perception.
References
1.
CohenM.Visual curvature and feedback factors in the production of prismatically induced curved-line aftereffects. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Assn, New York, April, 1963.
2.
GibsonJ. J.Adaptation with negative aftereffect. Psychol. Rev., 1937, 44, 242.
3.
HarrisC. S.Adaptation to displaced vision: Visual, motor, or proprioceptive change?Science, 1963, 141, 812–813.
4.
HeldR.Adaptation to rearrangement and visual-spatial aftereffects. Psychol. Beitr., 1962, 6, 439–450.
5.
HeldR.Movement-produced stimulation is important in prism-induced aftereffects: A reply to Hochberg. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 764.
6.
HeldR.RekoshJ.Motor-sensory feedback and the geometry of visual space. Science, 1963, 141, 722–723.
7.
HochbergJ.On the importance of movement-produced stimulation in prism-induced aftereffects. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 544.
8.
HochbergJ.HayJ.Figural aftereffect, after-image, and physiological nystagmus. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 480–482.
9.
KoehlerW.WallachH.Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269–357.
10.
KrauskopfJ.Figural after-effects with a stabilized retinal image. Amer. J. Psychol., 1960, 73, 294–297.
11.
MikaelianH.HeldR.Two types of adaptation to an optically-rotated visual field. Amer. J. Psychol., in press.
12.
WallsG. L.The problem of visual direction. Amer. J. Optom., 1951, 28, 55–83, 115–146.
