Rats were trained on a single-stimulus, successive discrimination in a free operant situation. An irrelevant stimulus dimension was present at ail times. Following attainment of the acquisition criterion, Ss were shifted immediately or given 4 or 8 days of overtraining before being shifted. Half of Ss were given a reversal shift and half a nonreversal shift. Overtraining did not affect reversal or nonreversal learning. These results were contrasted with those of Mackintosh (1962). Various theoretical issues were discussed in light of the present findings. It was tentatively concluded that the overtraining effect depends upon the role of observing behavior in the formation and overtraining of a discrimination.
References
1.
BrookshireK. H.WarrenJ. M., & BallG. G.Reversal and transfer learning following overtraining in rat and chicken. J. comp, physiol. Psychol., 1961, 54, 98–102.
2.
CapaldiE. J., & StevensonH. W.Response reversal following different amounts of training. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 195–198.
3.
ClaytonK. N.Reversal performance by rats following overlearning with and without irrelevant stimuli. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 66, 255–259.
4.
D'AmatoM. R., & JagodaH.Effects of extinction trials on discrimination reversal. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 59, 254–260.
5.
D'AmatoM. R., & JagodaH.Analysis of the role of overlearning in discrimination reversal. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 61, 45–50.
6.
D'AmatoM. R., & JagodaH.Overlearning and position reversal. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 117–122.
7.
D'AmatoM. R.SchiffD., & JagodaH.Resistance to extinction after varying amounts of discriminative or nondiscriminative instrumental training. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 526–532.
8.
ErlebacherA.Reversal learning in rats as a function of percentage of reinforcement and degree of learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 66, 84–90.
9.
GoodwinW. R., & LawrenceD. H.The functional independence of two discrimination habits associated with a constant stimulus situation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1955, 48, 437–443.
10.
HarlowH. F.Learning set and error factor theory. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 492–537.
11.
HillW. F., & SpearN. E.A replication of overlearning and reversal in a T maze. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 65, 317.
12.
HillW. F.SpearN. E., & ClaytonK. S.T maze reversal learning after different overtraining procedures. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 533–540.
13.
KendlerH. H.GlucksbergS., & KestonR.Perception and mediation in concept learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 61, 186–191.
14.
KendlerH. H., & KendlerT. S.Vertical and horizontal processes in problem solving. Psychol. Rev., 1962, 69, 1–16.
15.
MackintoshN. J.The effects of overtraining on a reversal and a nonreversal shift. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 555–559.
16.
ParkerB. K.Reversal and nonreversal discrimination shift as a function of overtraining. Unpublished Master's thesis, Univer. of Utah, 1964.
17.
PubolsB. H.The facilitation of visual and spatial discrimination reversal by overtraining. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 243–248.
18.
ReidL. S.The development of noncontinuity behavior through continuity learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 107–112.
19.
SutherlandN. S.Stimulus analysing mechanisms. In Proceedings of a symposium on the mechanisation of thought processes. Vol. 2. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1959. Pp. 575–609.
20.
WyckoffL. B.Jr.The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 431–442.
