Ss were instructed to generate random numbers while simultaneously listening to passages of varying degrees of approximation to English, under Recall and No-recall conditions. Randomness of choices was considered an index of attentional capacity and appeared to be a stable individual difference characteristic with a fair degree of generality across stimulus and instructional conditions.
References
1.
AttneaveF.Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1959.
2.
BaddeleyA. D.The capacity for generating information by randomization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18, 119–129.
3.
KahnemanD.BeattyJ., & PollackI.Perceptual deficit during a mental task. Science, 1967, 157, 218–219.
4.
MayznerM. S.TresseltM. E.AdlerS., & SchoenbergK. M.Correlations between subject-generated letter frequencies and observed frequencies in English. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1, 295–296.
5.
TaylorA., & MorayN.Statistical approximations to English and French. Language and Speech, 1960, 3, 7–10.
6.
TuneG. S.A brief survey of variables that influence random generation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964, 18, 705–710.
