213 Ss participated in 4 experiments designed to identify relationships between figural aftereffects elicited by hand, limb, and total body movements. The measures obtained were reliable and highly task specific.
References
1.
AdeyW. R.Recent thoughts on the neuron model based on brain wave analysis. Paper read at Biochemical Engineering Symposium in San Diego, California, April, 1961.
2.
BakanP., & WeilerR.Kinesthetic after-effect and mode of exposure to the inspection stimulus. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 65, 374–380.
3.
CameronP., & WertheimerM.Kinesthetic after-effects are in the hands, not in phenomenal space. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 20, 1131–1132.
4.
ChaplinM. R., & PollackR. H.The after-effects of prolonged arm extension. Acta Psychol., 1962, 20, 24–28.
5.
ComreyA. L.Tandem criteria for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 143–154.
6.
ComreyA. L., & AhumadaA.An improved procedure and program for minimum residual factor analysis. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 15, 91–96.
7.
CrattyB. J.Figural after-effects resulting from gross action patterns: Part III. Perceptual alterations of veer by interpolated movement. Res. Quart., 1965, 36, 22–28.
8.
CrattyB. J.Figural after-effects resulting from gross action patterns; the amount of exposure to the inspection task and the duration of the after-effects. Res. Quart., 1965, 36, 4–11.
9.
CrattyB. J.Perception of inclined plane while walking without vision. Percept. mot. Skills, 1966, 22, 547–556.
10.
CrattyB. J., & AmatelliF. E.Kinesthetics and gross action patterns: the role of kinesthetic after-effects in the arm-shoulder musculature. Res. Quart., 1969, 40, 23–29.
11.
CrattyB. J., & DuffyK. E.Relationships between figural after-effects elicited by selected bodily movements. National Science Foundation, NSF-GB-5664, Univer. of California, Los Angeles, 1967.
HuttonR. S.Kinesthetic after-effect produced by walking on a gradient. Res. Quart., 1966, 37, 368–374.
22.
JacksonC. V.The influence of previous movement and posture on subsequent posture. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 6, 72–78.
23.
JaffeR.The influence of visual stimulation of kinesthetic figural after-effect. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 70–75.
24.
KoehlerW.Unsolved problems in the field of figural after-effects. Psychol. Rec., 1965, 15, 63–84.
25.
KoehlerW., & DinnersteinD.Figural after-effects in kinesthesis. In Miscellanea psychologia Albert Michotte. Paris: Librairie Philosophique, 1947. Pp. 365–382.
26.
KohnstammO.Demonstration einer Katetonieartigen Erscheinung beim Gesunden. Neurol. Centralbl., 1915, 43, 290–301.
27.
LachmanS. J.A theory relating learning to electrophysiology of the brain. J. Psychol., 1965, 59, 275–281.
28.
NachmiasJ.Figural after-effects in kinesthetic space. Amer. J. Psychol., 1953, 66, 609–612.
29.
OsgoodC. E., & HeyerA. W.A new interpretation of the figural after-effect. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 98–118.
30.
PollackR. H.The after-effects of passive kinesthetic-tactual stimulation of the thumb and forefinger. Acta Psychol., 1963, 21, 17–23.
31.
PollackR. H.Application of the sensory-tonic theory of perception to figural after-effects. Acta Psychol., 1963, 21, 1–16.
32.
RockI.The nature of perceptual adaptation. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
33.
SellingL. S.An experimental investigation of the phenomenon of postural persistence. Arch. Psychol., 1933, No. 118.
34.
SingerG., & DayR. H.Temporal determinants as a kinesthetic after-effect. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 69, 343–348.
35.
SingerG., & DayR. H.Inter-limb and inter-joint transfer of a kinesthetic spatial after-effect. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 69, 434–438.
36.
WernerH., & WapnerW.Sensory-tonic field theory of perception. J. Pers., 1949, 18, 88–107.
