As predicted from an arousal model, previous research demonstrated a curvilinear relationship between sensory deprivation (SD) and performance on simple cognitive tasks; on complex tasks, however, the sub- to optimal part of the curve was not found. The addition of a control group of 17 men who did not anticipate SD provided this missing portion, lending further support to the model and indicating an important consideration for control treatments in SD studies.
References
1.
SternR. M.GauppL.LeonardW. C.A comparison of GSR and subjective adaptation to stressful stimuli. Psychophysiology, 1970, 7, 3–9.
2.
SuedfeloP.The cognitive effects of sensory deprivation: The role of task complexity. Canad. J. Psychol., 1968, 22, 302–307.
3.
SuedfeldP.Changes in intellectual performance and in susceptibility to influence. In ZubekJ. P. (Ed.), Sensory deprivation fifteen years of research. New York Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969, Pp. 126–166.
4.
SuedfeldP.LandonP. B.Mons and task complenary support for a model of cognitive changes in sensory deprivation. J. exp. Psychol., 1970, 83, 329–330.
