Abstract
Four groups of 15 female subjects each were classified along a quantitative dimension for proportion of perceived oscillation and threshold for binocular disparity. Analyses of variance showed that significant differences in proportion of perceived oscillation were accompanied by significant differences in threshold for binocular disparity for perceivers of “high” and “low” oscillation (p < .05). For perceivers of “intermediate” oscillation significant differences in proportion of perceived oscillation but not threshold for binocular disparity were found. It was suggested that: (1) intersubject variability in perceived oscillation may be governed by the threshold for binocular disparity, (2) “low” perceivers may be especially sensitive to the magnitude of the cue, (3) “intermediate” perceivers' subjective reports may be primarily dependent on response criteria and the multiplicity of subjective factors which constitute it, (4) “high” perceivers apparently have least response sensitivity and they cannot maintain a consistent response criterion.