An autokinetic test was given to 76 female subjects who were then randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups of 19 subjects each. Two groups were retested after 1 and 6 wk., respectively. The other two groups were asked to recall their initial experience after 1 and 6 wk., respectively. Inter-trial correlations of the measures were generally higher for the recall conditions than for the retest conditions. The results were discussed in terms of the potential influence that recall may have on the test-retest reliability of autokinesis.
References
1.
FarrowB. J.SantosJ. F.JohnsonL., & HainesJ. R.Comparison of portable and dark room autokinetic movement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 343–350.
2.
HainesJ. R.SantosJ. F., & FarrowB. J.Stability of the autokinetic phenomenon. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 394.
3.
HanawaltN. G.Memory trace for figures in recall and recognition. Archives of Psychology, New York, 1937, 31, No. 216.
SantosJ. F.FarrowB. J., & HainesJ. R.Consistency and style of autokinetic movement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 583–586.
7.
SchwartzM., & ShagassC.Note on the relationship between autokinesis and psychiatric diagnosis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1960, 11, 253–257.
8.
VothA. C.Individual differences in the autokinetic phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941, 29, 306–322.
9.
VothA. C.An experimental study of mental patients through the autokinetic phenomenon. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1947, 103, 793–805.
10.
VothH. M., & MaymanM. A.A dimension of personality organization: An experimental study of ego-closeness—ego-distance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1963, 8, 366–380.
11.
WikeE.L.Water beds and sexual satisfaction: Wike's law of low odd primes (WLLOP). Psychological Reports, 1973, 33, 192–194.
