It is argued that to the degree that some imagining processes are transformatory in nature, estimates of reliability either bear no relation to their validity or in fact may indicate lack of validity. This is so because the nature of transformation implies that the object under study will not stand still to be measured. Any indication of reliability would then merely be a fortuitous coincidence between the waxing and waning of the object to be measured and of the measuring device. Alternatively, the presence of reliable measurement may indicate that the imagining being measured is related to verbal-mathematical reasoning.
References
1.
CorbinH.Divine epiphany and spiritual birth in Ismailian gnosis. In CampbellJ. (Ed.), Papers from the Eranos yearbooks.Vol. 5. New York: Pantheon, 1964. Pp. 69–160.
2.
CorbinH.Creative imagination in the sufism of Ibn 'Arabi.Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univer. Press, 1969.
3.
CronbachL. J.Essentials of psychological testing. (3rd ed.) New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
4.
FoucaultM.The order of things.New York: Random House, 1970.
5.
FoucaultM.The archeology of knowledge.New York: Pantheon, 1972.
6.
FreudS.Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. In Collected papers.Vol. 3. New York: Basic Books, 1959. Pp. 296–390.
7.
FreudS.New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. In Complete psychological works.Vol. 22. London: Hogarth Press, 1964. Pp. 5–184.
8.
FriedmanS., & JuhaszJ. B.Environments: Notes and selections on objects, spaces, and behavior.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1974.
9.
JornA., & ArnaudN.La langue verte et la cuite.Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1968.
10.
JuhaszJ. B.Greek theories of imagination. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1971, 7, 39–58.
11.
JuhaszJ. B.An experimental study of imagining. Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 588–600. (a)
12.
JuhaszJ. B.On the reliability of two measures of imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 35, 874. (b)
13.
JuhaszJ. B.Development of a performance measure of imagining ability. XXth International Congress of Psychology: Proceedings.Tokyo: Science Council of Japan, 1974. Pp. 346–347.
14.
JuhaszJ. B.Fantasy and physical form. In SuedfeldP. & RusselJ. A. (Eds.), The behavioral basis of design: Book I. Selected papers.Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1976. Pp. 3–64. (a)
15.
JuhaszJ. B.Psychology and physical form.Berkeley: Department of Architecture, College of Environmental Design, Univer. of California, 1976. (b)
16.
JuhaszJ. B.Psychology of paradox and vice versa. Psychological Reports, 1976, 39, 911–914. (c)
17.
MarksD. F.Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 1973, 64, 17–24.
18.
McLuhanM.Understanding media: The extensions of man.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
19.
PlagetJ.Psychology of intelligence.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.
PiagetJ., & InhelderB.Mental images. In FraisseP. & PiagetJ. (Eds.), Experimental psychology, its scope and method.Vol. 7. New York: Basic Books, 1969. Pp. 87–146.
22.
PiagetJ., & InhelderB.Mental imagery in the child.New York: Basic Books, 1971.
23.
RilkeR. M.Briefe aus Muzot. 1921–1926.Leipzig: Insel, 1935.
24.
RilkeR. M.Duino elegies.New York: Norton, 1939.
25.
SarbinT. R., & CoeW. C.Hypnosis: A social psychological analysis of influence communication.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
26.
SarbinT. R., & JuhaszJ. B.The historical background of the concept of hallucination. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1967, 3, 339–358.
27.
SarbinT. R., & JuhaszJ. B.Toward a theory of imagination. Journal of Personality, 1970, 38, 52–76.
28.
SarbinT. R., & JuhaszJ. B.The social context of “hallucinations.” In SiegelR. K. & WestJ. (Eds.), Hallucinations: Behavior, experience, theory.New York: Wiley, 1975. Pp. 241–256.
29.
TartC. T. (Ed.) Altered states of consciousness.New York: Wiley, 1969.
30.
TartC. T.States of consciousness.New York: Dutton, 1975.
31.
TondoT. R., & CautelaJ. R.Assessment of imagery in covert reinforcement. Psychological Reports, 1974, 34, 1271–1280.
32.
WhiteK. G.JuhaszJ. B., & WilsonP.Is man no more than this?: Evaluative bias in interspecies comparison. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1973, 9, 203–212.
