Conspecific Images as Elements of Compound Stimuli Controlling Operant Responding in Female Rhesus Monkeys

Abstract

Six adult female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) performed food-reinforced button presses in a compound stimulus discrimination paradigm. Three subjects were trained on a compound stimulus consisting of a color motion picture of an adult male rhesus superimposed over a homogeneous blue field of color. A second group of three subjects was trained on a compound consisting of a color slide depicting an adult male rhesus and the blue field. Subsequent testing of relative stimulus control exerted by either compounds, conspecific stimuli (movie-slide) or blue field alone was carried out. Results indicated that for the movie group, stimulus control was attenuated when either the conspecific stimulus or blue field was presented as a single S+ stimulus compared to tests using the compound stimulus as S+. Subjects in the movie group shared attention to both constituent elements of the compound. Statistically significant differences in stimulus control between compound, conspecific stimulus, and blue field were not found for the slide group. Superior control by the compound movie-blue field was explained as the result of increased visual salience of an altered (blue) conspecific image.

References

Bruning

J. L.

Kintz

B. L.

Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1968.

Butler

R. A.

The reactions of rhesus monkeys to motion pictures. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1961, 98, 239–245.

Butler

R. A.

The reactions of rhesus monkeys to fear-provoking stimuli. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1964, 104, 321–330.

Chance

M. R. A.

Attention structure as the basis of primate rank orders. Man, 1967, 2, 503–518.

Haude

R. H.

Detwiler

D. H.

Visual observing by rhesus monkeys: influence of potentially threatening stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 43, 231–237.

Haude

R. H.

Graber

J. G.

Farres

A. G.

Visual observing by rhesus monkeys: some relationships with social dominance rank. Animal Learning and Behavior, 1976, 4, 163–166.

Humphrey

N. K.

Interest and pleasure: two determinants of a monkey's visual preferences. Perception, 1972, 1, 395–416.

Humphrey

N. K.

Keeble

G. R.

How monkeys acquire a new way of seeing. Perception, 1976, 5, 51–56.

Miller

R. E.

Experimental approaches to the physiological and behavior concomitants of affective communication in rhesus monkeys. In Altman

S. A.

(Ed.), Social communication among primates. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1967. Pp. 125–134.

10.

Miller

R. E.

Caul

W. F.

Mirsky

I. A.

Communication of affects between feral and socially isolated monkeys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 231–239.

11.

Ray

B. A.

Strategy in studies of attention: a commentary on D. I. Mostofsky's

Attention: contemporary theory and analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972, 17, 293–297.

12.

Sackett

G. P.

Responses of rhesus monkeys to social stimulation presented by means of colored slides. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 1027–1028.

13.

Sutherland

N. S.

Mackintosh

N. J.

Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

14.

Symmes

Anxiety reduction and novelty as goals of visual exploration by monkeys. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1959, 94, 181–198.

15.

Virgo

H. B.

Waterhouse

M. J.

The emergence of attention structure amongst rhesus monkeys. Man, 1969, 4, 85–93.

16.

Wilcoxon

H. C.

Borrebach

D. E.

Juvenile rhesus monkeys living in responsive and nonresponsive environments. Paper presented at the annual Gatlinburg Conference on Mental Retardation Research, March, 1975.