AkinsG. T.A comparison of descriptive statement vs. numerical feedback of intelligence test results. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Univer. of South Alabama, 1977.
2.
BalanceW. D. G.SandbergS. S.BringmannW. G.Acceptance of trait-descriptive vs “medical model” oriented feedback statements. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, 539–544.
3.
BringmannW. G.BalanceW. D. G.SandbergS. S.Self-validation of programmed feedback statements. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, 733–734.
4.
BurgerM.Differential effects of minimal and more specific feedback statements derived from interest scatter on the WAIS. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of Windsor, 1974.
5.
HowittP. S.The effects of vague vs. explicit communications on the ability to distinguish valid from invalid feedback statements. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of Windsor, 1977.
6.
JacksonD. N.Manual for Personality Research Form. Goshen, N. Y.: Research Psychologists Press, 1967.
7.
LeenaarsA.The acceptance of psychological feedback statements as self-descriptive: A look at true vs. false and positively stated vs. negatively stated communications. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of Windsor, 1976.
8.
McDermottE.Effects of order of presentation of favorable and unfavorable personality interpretations on the endorsement of test feedback. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of Windsor, 1976.
9.
TruslerM. H.Reactions to vocational interest feedback as related to style of feedback report and authenticity of information. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of Windsor, 1976.