Rating scale estimates of sensitivity to visual flicker were obtained from three subjects under 10 different intensities of auditory stimulation. Results indicated reliable “sawtooch”-like changes in sensitivity as a function of increasing intensity of white noise. No systematic and reliable changes were found in estimates of response bias. Theory and future research are discussed with reference to the possible contribution of cortical arousal.
References
1.
AllenF.SchwartzM.The effect of stimulation of the senses of vision, hearing, taste, and smell upon the sensitivity of the organs of vision. Journal of General Physiology.1940, 24, 105–121.
2.
ClarkW. C.The psyche in psychophysics: A sensory-decision theory analysis of the effect of instructions on flicker sensitivity and response bias. Psychological Bulletin.1966, 65, 358–366.
3.
ClarkW. C.BrownJ. C.RutschmannJ.Flicker sensitivity and response bias in psychiatric patients and normal subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967. 72. 35–42.
4.
ClarkW. C.RutschmannJ.LinkR.BrownJ. C.Comparison of flicker-fusion thresholds obtained by the methods of forced-choice and limits on psychiatric patients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 19–30.
5.
EganJ. P.ClarkeF. R.Psychophysics and signal detection. In SidowskiJ. B. (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology.New York: McGraw-Hill. 1966. Pp. 211–246.
6.
EijkmanE.VendrickA.Can a sensory system be specified by its internal noise?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 37, 1102–1109.
7.
FusterJ. M.Effects of stimulation of brain stem on tachistoscopic perception. Science, 1958, 127, 150.
8.
FusterJ. M.UyedaA. A.Facilitation of tachistoscopic performance by stimulation of midbrain tegmental points in the monkey. Experimental Neurology, 1962, 6, 384–406.
9.
GreenD. M.SwetsJ. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics.New York: Wiley, 1966.
10.
KnoxG. W.Investigations of flicker and fusion: III. The effect of auditory stimulation on the visual CFF. Journal of General Psychology, 1945, 33, 139–143. (a)
11.
KnoxG. W.Investigations of flicker and fusion: IV. The effect of auditory flicker on the pronouncedness of visual flicker. Journal of General Psychology, 1945, 33, 145–154. (b)
12.
KravkovS. W.Action des excitations auditives sur la frequence critique des papillotemeuts limineux. Acta Ophthalmologica, 1935, 13, 260–272.
13.
KrugerS. I.The effects of chlorpromazine on flicker fusion threshold with inter-sensory stimulation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boston Univer., 1962.
14.
LindsleyD. B.Common factors in sensory deprivation, sensory distortion, and sensory overload. In SolomonP.KubzanskyP.LeidermanP.MendelsonJ.TrumbullR.SolomonP.KubzanskyP.LeidermanP.MendelsonJ.TrumbullR.WexlerD. (Eds.), Sensory deprivation.Cambridge: Harvard Univer. Press, 1961. Pp. 174–194.
15.
MaierB.BevanW.BeharI.The effect of auditory stimulation upon the critical flicker frequency for different regions of the visual spectrum. American Journal of Psychology.1961, 74, 67–73.
16.
McCroskeyR. L.The effect of specified levels of white noise upon flicker fusion frequency. U. S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Pensacola, Florida. Joint Research Project, NM 18 OZ 99 Subtask 1, Report No. 80, 1958.
17.
McNicholD.A primer of signal detection theory.London: Allen & Unwin, 1972.
18.
MillerH. L.The effects of auditory stimulation on the critical flicker fusion frequency response. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univer. of Hawaii, 1963.
19.
OgilvieJ. L.Effect of auditory flutter on the visual critical flicker frequency. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1956, 10, 61–68. (a)
20.
OgilvieJ. L.The interaction of auditory flutter and CFF, the effect of brightness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1956, 10, 207–210. (b)
21.
Von SchillerP.Interrelation of different senses in perception. British Journal of Psychology, 1935, 25, 465–469.
22.
WalkerE. L.SawyerT. M.The interaction between critical flicker frequency and acoustic stimulation. Psychological Record, 1961, 11, 187–193.
