Sending and receiving accuracy of nonverbal facial cues was assessed in 17 dating but non-cohabiting college couples. Field-dependence/field-independence of each person was measured using the Embedded-figures Test. There were no relationships between several measures of receiving accuracy and cognitive style. However, field-dependent individuals were better senders of facial expressions. This finding is consistent with the literature on verbal self-disclosure and with other recent studies of accuracy of nonverbal sending.
References
1.
BirminghamD. L.Situational and personality factors in conformity. (Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis Univer., 1974)Dissertation Abstracts International, 1974, 35, 2421B. (Univer. Microfilms No. 74-24, 042)
2.
BuckR.A test of nonverbal receiving ability: preliminary studies. Human Communication Research, 1976, 2, 162–171.
3.
BuckR., & DuffyR.Nonverbal communication of affect in brain-damaged patients. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August, 1977.
4.
BuckR., & LermanJ.General vs. specific nonverbal sensitivity and clinical training. Paper presented at the Seventeenth International Congress of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Copenhagen, Denmark, August, 1977.
5.
BuckR.MillerR. E., & CaulW. F.Sex, personality and physiological variables in the communication of emotion via facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 587–596.
6.
BuckR.SavinV. J.MillerR. E., & CaulW. F.Nonverbal communication of affect in humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 362–371.
7.
BuschJ. C., & DeRidderL. M.Conformity in preschool disadvantaged children as related to field-dependence, sex, and verbal reinforcement. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 667–673.
8.
CohenB. D.BerentF. W., & RobinsonJ. W.Field dependence and lateralization of function in the human brain. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1973, 28, 165–167.
9.
EagleM.GoldbergerL., & BreitmanM.Field dependence and memory for social vs neutral and relevant vs irrelevant incidental stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 29, 903–910.
10.
EhrlichH. J., & GraevenD. B.Reciprocal self-disclosure in a dyad. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 389–400.
11.
EkmanP.Nonverbal behavior and psychopathology. In FriedmanR. J. & KatzM. M. (Eds.), The psychology of depression: contemporary theory and research. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
12.
HarperR. G.WiensA. N., & FugitaB.Individual differences in encoding-decoding of affect and emotional dissimulation. Presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August, 1977.
13.
KonstadtN., & FormanE.Field dependence and external directedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 490–493.
14.
McNemarQ.Psychological statistics. New York: Wiley, 1955.
15.
NevillD.Experimental manipulation of dependency motivation and its effects on eye contact and measures of field dependency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 72–79.
16.
NunnallyJ. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
17.
RosenthalR.ArcherD.KoivumakiJ. H.DimatteoM. R., & RogersP. L.Assessing sensitivity to nonverbal communication: the PONS test. American Psychological Association Division 8 Newsletter January, 1974.
18.
Sousa-PozaJ. F.RohrbergR., & ShulmanE.Field dependence and self-disclosure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 36, 735–738.
