Inhibition of—But Not between—Orientation Detectors: A Theoretical Note on Illusions of Direction

Abstract

In accounting for illusions of direction, many current models assume lateral inhibition among orientation detectors; however, that assumption is unnecessary. Rather, the illusions can be predicted by a model based on the pattern of inhibition and excitation across orientation detectors as caused by a single stimulus line. From the collective effects of multiple stimulus lines, a pattern of excitation and inhibition results which is perceived as an illusion of direction. This collective effect is predicted by convoluting a function representing physical orientation of stimulus lines with a function representing the pattern of inhibition and excitation elicited by a single line. Both perceived angle-expansion (repulsion) and perceived angle-contraction (attraction) are generated by the model.

References

Andrews

D. P.

Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. Vision Research, 1967, 7, 975–1013.

Blakemore

Carpenter

R. H. S.

Georgeson

M. A.

Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature (Load.), 1970, 228, 37–39.

Bouma

Andriessen

J. J.

Induced changes in the perceived orientation of isolated line segments. Vision Research, 1970, 10, 333–349.

Carpenter

R. H. S.

Blakemore

Interactions between orientations in human vision. Experimental Brain Research, 1973, 18, 287–303.

Hubel

D. H.

Weisel

T. N.

Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 1959, 148, 574–591.

Hubel

D. H.

Weisel

T. N.

Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 1962, 160, 106–154.'

Morinaga

Über die Raumwahrnehmung in Honsicht auf die optischen Täuschungen. In Proceeding of the Fifteenth International Congress of Psychology. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1959. Pp. 273–274.

O'Toole

Wenderoth

The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian. Vision Research, 1977, 17, 367–374.

Over

Broerse

Crassint

Orientation illusion and masking in central and peripheral vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 96, 25–31.

10.

Oyama

Determinants of the Zöllner illusion. Psychological Research, 1975, 37, 261–280.

11.

Oyama

Feature analyzers, optical illusions, and figural aftereffects. Perception, 1977, 6, 401–406.

12.

Wallace

G. K.

The critical distance of interaction in the Zöllner illusion. Perception and Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 261–264.

13.

Wallace

G. K.

The effect of contrast on the Zöllner illusion. Vision Research, 1975, 15, 965–966.

14.

Wenderoth

Parkinson

White

A comparison of visual tilt illusions measured by the techniques of vertical setting, parallel matching, and dot alignment. Perception, 1979, 8, 47–57.