A mock juror simulation was employed to analyze observers' attributions of responsibility for the transmittal of an illegal act. Student subjects (N = 261) were presented a newspaper article depicting a court case in which a subordinate personnel interviewer was being sued for sex discrimination which was (1) admitted and (2) under orders from a superior. As predicted the higher the status of the interviewer—the more attributed responsibility. However, the superior was attributed more responsibility than the subordinate regardless of the latter's status in the organization.
References
1.
ErlangerH. S.Jury research in America: Its past and future. Law and Society Review, 1970, 4, 345–370.
2.
GerbasiK. C.ZuckermanM.ReissH. T.Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 323–345.
3.
HamiltonV. L.Obedience and responsibility: A jury simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 126–146.
