Abstract
The MMPI was analyzed by readability formulas which represent varying criterion of comprehension from 50 to 90%. Computation involved a computer-generated word and syllable count, taking as many non-reoccurring samples as possible. If an examiner wishes to ensure 90% comprehension of the inventory items, nine successful years of schooling seem necessary.
References
1.
Dahlstrom
W. G.
Welsh
G. S.
Dahlstrom
L. E.
An MMPI handbook. Vol. 1 . Clinical interpretations . Minneapolis : Univer. of Minnesota Press , 1972 .
2.
Forbes
F. W.
Cottle
W. C.
A new method for determining readability of standardized tests . Journal of Applied Psychology , 1953 , 37 , 185 –190 .
3.
Fry
E.
A readability formula that saves time . Journal of Reading , 1968 , 11 , 513 –517 , 575 –578 .
4.
Hanes
B.
Reading ease and MMPI results . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 1953 , 9 , 83 –85 .
5.
Harris
A.
Sipay
E.
How to increase reading ability . (6th ed. ) New York : Longman , 1975 .
6.
Hathaway
S. R.
McKinley
J. C.
Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory . New York : Psychological Corp. , 1943 , 1970 .
7.
Klare
G. R.
The measurement of readability . Ames, IA : Iowa State Univer. Press , 1963 .
8.
McLaughlin
G. H.
SMOG-grading . Journal of Reading , 1969 , 12 , 639 –646 .
9.
Powers
R. D.
Sumner
W. A.
Kearl
B. E.
A recalculation of four readability formulas . Journal of Educational Psychology , 1958 , 49 , 99 –105 .
10.
Taylor
J. F.
Graham
J. R.
A simplified MMPI form with reduced reading difficulty level . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 1974 , 30 , 182 –185 .