BrunswikE.Perception and the representative design oj psychological experiments. Berkeley: Univer. of California Press, 1956.
2.
KaplanR.Predictors of environmental preference: Designers and “clients.” In PreiserW. F. E. (Ed.), Environmental design research. Vol. 1. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1973. Pp. 265–274.
3.
KaplanR.Some methods and strategies in the prediction of preference. In ZubeE. H.FabosG. G., & BrushR. O. (Eds.), Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions and resources. New York: Halsted Press, 1975. Pp. 118–129.
4.
KaplanS., & WendtJ. S.Preference and the visual environment: Complexity and some alternatives. In MitchellW. J. (Ed.), Environmental design: Research and practice. Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association Conference Three. Los Angeles: School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Univer. of California Press, 1972. Pp. 6–8–1–6–8–5.
5.
UlrichR. S.Visual landscape preference: A model and application. Man-Environment Systems, 1977, 7, 279–293.
6.
WohlwillJ. F.Amount of stimulus exploration and preference as differential functions of stimulus complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 1968, 4, 307–312.
7.
WohlwillJ. F.Environmental aesthetics: The environment as a source of affect. In AltmanI. & WohlwillJ. F. (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum, 1976. Pp. 37–86.