The cognitive strategies used by 31 college students, 15 men and 16 women, while solving the Rod and Frame Test in a dark room were evaluated. These strategies were analyzed in terms of the subjects' performance on the task. Those who scored lower and who were better performers on the task, used significantly more “internal” strategies than those subjects with higher scores (worse performers) who in turn employed a great number of “external” strategies in solving the task.
References
1.
Fernández-BallesterosR.Los autoinformes. In Fernandez-BallesterosR. (Ed.), Psicodiagnóstico. Madrid: Unidades Didácticas, UNED, 1983. Pp. 415–465.
2.
Fernández-BallesterosR., & ManningL.Estrategias en la resolución del test del marco y la varilla y dependencia-independencia de campo. Revista de Psicotogía General y Aplicada, 1983, 38, 1031–1043.
3.
GenestM., & TurkD.Think aloud approach to cognitive assessment. In MerluzziT. V.GlassC. R., & GenestM. (Eds.), Cognitive assessment. New York: Guilford Press, 1981. Pp. 233–264.
4.
LinnM., & KyllonenP.The field dependence-independence construct: Some, one or none. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981, 73, 261–273.
5.
SigmanE.GoodenoughD., & FlannaganM.Instructions, illusory self-tilt and the rod and frame test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1979, 31, 155–165.
6.
TempletonW. B.The role of gravitational cues in the judgment of visual orientation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 451–457.
7.
WitkinH. A., & AschS.Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception on the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948, 38, 762–782.
8.
WitkinH. A., & GoodenoughD.Cognitive style: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press, 1981.
9.
WitkinH. A.GoodenoughD., & OltmanP. K.Psychological differentiation: Current status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1127–1145.
10.
WitkinH. A., & OltmanP. K.Cognitive style. International Journal of Neurology, 1967, 6, 119–137.
