The performances of 29 normal and 29 neurologically impaired-learning disabled children (aged 7.3 to 15.3 yr.) were evaluated on unfamiliar face and common object recognition tasks. Although the normal children performed better, the relative difficulty of face and object recognition was the same for both groups.
References
1.
AmbroseJ. A. (1961) The development of the smelling response in early infancy. In FossB. M. (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior. London: Methuen. Pp. 179–201.
2.
BentonA. L.HamsherK. De S.VarneyN. R.SpreenO. (1983) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
3.
BentonA. L.Van AllenN. W. (1968) Impairment in facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease. Cortex, 4, 344–358.
4.
BollerF.DerenziE. (1967) Relationship between visual memory deficits and hemispheric locus of lesion. Neurology, 17, 1952–1958.
5.
BrydenM. P.RaineyC. A. (1963) Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 568–571.
6.
CareyS. (1974, July) The biological bases of development. In BrainardS. G. (Ed.), Learning disabilities: issues and recommendations for research: papers derived from the National Institute of Education Conference on Learning Disabilities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Pp. 15–31.
7.
DeRenziE.FaglioniP.SpinnlerH. (1968) The performance of patients with unilateral brain damage on face recognition tasks. Clinica delle Malattie Netvose e Mentali, Universitá di Milano.
8.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1981) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised: manual for Forms L and M. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9.
ElliotP. B. (1964) Appendix 1—tables of d’. In SwetsJ. A. (Ed.), Signal detection and recognition by human observers. New York: Wiley. Pp. 651–684.
10.
HilltardR. D. (1973) Hemispheric laterality effects on a facial recognition task in normal subjects. Cortex, 9, 246–258.
11.
KimuraD. (1963) Right temporal lobe damage: perception of unfamiliar stimuli after damage. Archives of Neurology, 8, 264–271.
12.
KimuraD. (1973) The asymmetry of the human brain. Scientific American, 228(3), 70–78.
13.
KinsbourneM. (1975) The ontogeny of cerebral dominance. Paper given at the New York Academy of Sciences, New York.
14.
MascovitchM. (1974) Masking and reaction-time studies on lateral asymmetries for faces. Paper given at the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.
15.
MilnerB. (1971) Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 272–277.
16.
OldfieldR. C.WingfieldA. (1965) Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273–281.
17.
RavenJ. C. (1960) Guide to the Standard Progressive Matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.
18.
RizzolattiG.UmiltáC.BerlucchiG. (1971) Opposite superiorities of the left and right cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material. Brain, 94, 431–442.
19.
TurnbrS.MillerL. K. (1975) Some boundary conditions for laterality effects in children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 342–353.
20.
WarringtonE. K.JamesM. (1967) An experimental investigation of facial recognition in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex, 3, 317–326.
21.
WechslerD. (1974) Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.
22.
WykeM.EttlingerG. (1961) Efficiency of recognition in left and right visual fields. Archives of Neurology, 5, 659–665.
23.
YinR. K. (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.
24.
YinR. K. (1970) Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability. Neuropsychology, 8, 395–402.
