Is the Matching Familiar Figures Test a Measure of Cognitive Style?: A Warning for Users

Abstract

A probabilistic model of reflection-impulsivity as measured by the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT) is presented and tested on 77 fourth graders. In testing the model two groups emerged, a random response group (n = 22) and a cognitive response group (n = 55), who use the evaluation process. Correlations among latencies, total errors, initial errors, school-scores, and IQs were compared for our total sample and the two groups. The correlation of MFFT latencies and errors disappeared for the random-response group and new correlations with errors appeared while the cognitive response group kept a statistically significant correlation of latencies with errors and no other error correlation was shown. This last group was classified by Kagan's median-split procedure showing that most reflective subjects kept their classification. Preliminary results suggest a reinterpretation of reflection-impulsivity literature, especially as related to the impulsive style.

References

Ault

R. L.

Mitchell

Hartman

D. P.

(1976) Some methodological problems in reflection-impulsivity research. Child Development, 47, 227–231.

Becker

Bender

N. N.

Morrison

(1978) Measuring impulsivity-reflectivity: a critical review. Journal of learning Disabilities, 11, 626–632.

Bentler

P. M.

McClain

(1976) A multitrait-multimethod analysis of reflection-impulsivity. Child Development, 47, 218–226.

Block

J. H.

Harrington

D. M.

(1974) Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity. Developmental Psychology, 10, 611–632.

Block

J. H.

Harrington

D. M.

(1975) Comment on the Kagan-Messer reply. Developmental Psychology, 11, 249–252.

Brocke

(1984) Zur Diagnose, Atiologie und Therapie des Hyperkinese-Syndroms. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 33, 222–233.

Butter

E. J.

Snyder

F. R.

(1982) Effect of order of presentation on simultaneous and sequential Matching Familiar Figures Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 1259–1262.

Cairns

Cammock

(1978) Development of a more reliable version of the Matching Familiar Figures test. Developmental Psychology, 14, 555–560.

Cairns

Cammock

(1983) Preliminary norms for the MFF–20. Coleraine, No. Ireland: New University of Ulster.

10.

Duryea

E. J.

Glover

J. A.

(1982) A review of the research on reflection and impulsivity in children. Genetic Psychological Monographs, 106, 217–237.

11.

Egeland

Weinberg

R. A.

(1976) The Matching Familiar Figures Test: a look at its psychometric credibility. Child Development, 47, 483–491.

12.

Falender

C. A.

Heber

(1977) Conceptual tempo and mother-child interaction: results from a longitudinal intervention program. Psychological Reports, 41, 995–1002.

13.

Feverstein

(1980) Instrumental enrichment: an intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: Univer. Park Press.

14.

Genser

Hafele

(1978) [Reflectivity and impulsivity: ability or cognitive style.] Zeitscrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 10, 114–123.

15.

Genshaft

J. L.

Hirt

(1979) Race effects in modifying cognitive impulsivity through self-instruction and modeling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 185–194.

16.

Gjerde

Block

(1985) Longitudinal consistency of Matching Familiar Figures Test from early childhood to preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 21, 262–271.

17.

Glenwick

I. S.

Croft

R. G.

Barocas

Black

H. K.

(1979) Reflection-impulsivity in predelinquent preadolescents in a residential facility. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 34–40.

18.

Hall

Russell

(1974) Multitrait-multimethod analysis of conceptual tempo. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 932–939.

19.

Kagan

(1971) Understanding children: behavior, motives and thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

20.

Kagan

Messer

S. B.

(1975) A reply to: “Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity”. Developmental Psychology, 11, 244–248.

21.

Kagan

Rosman

B. L.

Day

Albert

Phillips

(1964) Information processing in the child: significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 78, No. 1 (Whole No. 578).

22.

Kennedy

C. B.

Butter

E. J.

(1978) Cognitive style in two modalities, vision and audition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 193–199.

23.

Kogan

(1973) Creativity and cognitive style: a life span perspective. In Baltes

P. B.

Schaie

K. W.

(Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: personality and socialization. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 145–178.

24.

Loper

A. B.

Hallahan

D. P.

(1980) A comparison of the reliability and validity of the standard MFF and MFF-20 with learning disabled children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 377–384.

25.

Margolis

Skipton

L. H.

Brannigan

Heverly

(1980) The validity of Form F of the Matching Familiar Figures Test with Kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 12–22.

26.

McKenna

F. P.

(1985) Measures of field dependence: cognitive style or cognitive ability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 593–603.

27.

Messer

S. B.

(1976) Reflection-impulsivity: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026–1052.

28.

Messer

S. B.

Brodzinsky

D. M.

(1981) Three year stability of reflection-impulsivity in young adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 17, 848–850.

29.

Moore

M. G.

Haskins

McKinney

J. D.

(1980) Classroom behavior of reflective and impulsive children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 59–75.

30.

Nakasawa

(1984) Change of visual scanning among four cognitive style preschoolers after error response. XXIII International Congress of Psychology, 1984, II, 179, (Abstract).

31.

Nickel

(1985) Cognitive styles and eidetic imagery-critical reflections on two psychological constructs and their practical implications. Psychologie in Exziehung und Unterricht, 32, 1–13.

32.

Oas

(1985) Clinical utility of an index of impulsivity on the Draw-A-Person test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 310. (a).

33.

Oas

(1985) Impulsivity and delinquent behavior among incarcerated adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 422–424. (b).

34.

Odonnell

J. P.

Paulsen

K. A.

McGann

J. D.

(1978) Matching Familiar Figures Test: a unidimensional measure of reflection-impulsivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 1247–1253.

35.

Salkind

N. J.

Kojima

Zelniker

(1978) Cognitive tempo in American, Japanese and Israeli Children. Child Development, 49, 1024–1027.

36.

Salkind

N. J.

Wright

J. C.

(1977) The development of reflection-impulsivity and cognitive efficiency. Human Development, 20, 377–387.

37.

Siegelman

(1969) Reflective and impulsive observing behavior. Child Development, 40, 1213–1222.

38.

Solís-Cámara

R. P.

(1985) Effectos del entrenamiento en discriminación visual vs el uso de autoinstructiones en la modificatión del estilo impulsivo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 17, 205–226.

39.

Solís-Cámara

R. P.

Fox

(1983) Impulsive versus inefficient problem solving in retarded and nonretarded Mexican children. Journal of Psychology, 114, 187–191.

40.

Solís-Cámara

R. P.

Fox

(1985) Reflection-Impulsivity in Mexican children: cross-cultural relationships. Journal of General Psychology, 112, 285–290.

41.

Solís-Cámara

R. P.

Gomez

M. L.

(1985) Children's human figure drawings and impulsive style at two levels of socioeconomic status. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1039–1042.

42.

Solís-Cámara

R. P.

Troyo

S. R.

Solís-Cámara

V. P.

(1983) Relación entre los estilos de reflexión-impulsividad y el desempeño de niños en una tarea de discriminación visual. Salud Mental, 6, 24–32.

43.

Stein

Prindaville

S. P.

(1976) Discrimination learning and stimulus generalization by impulsive and reflective children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 21, 25–39.

44.

Victor

J. B.

Halverson

C. F.

Montague

R. B.

(1985) Relation between reflection-impulsivity and behavioral impulsivity in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 141–148.

45.

Wallbrown

F. H.

Wirth

Engin

A. W.

(1975) Some evidence relevant to Kagan's comments on the clinical interpretation of the Bender-Gestalt. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 345–347.

46.

Weithorn

C. J.

Kagen

Marcus

(1984) The relationship of activity level ratings and cognitive impulsivity to task performance and academic achievement. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 587–606.

47.

Williams

Lahey

B. B.

(1977) The functional independence of response latency and accuracy: implications for the concept of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 371–378.

48.

Wright

J. C.

(1973) Technical report on the Kansas Reflection-Impulsivity Scale for Preschoolers (KRISP). Lawrence, KS: Center for Research in Early Childhood Education.

49.

Zelniker

Jeffrey

W. E.

Ault

Parsons

(1972) Analysis and modfication of search strategies of impulsive and reflective children on the Matching Familiar Figures test. Child Development, 43, 321–335.