The effect of illumination on the outcome of subliminal psychodynamic activation experiments is discussed and the bleaching hypothesis Silverman, Ross, Adler, and Lustig in 1978 used to explain negative results under certain illumination conditions is critically evaluated. Illumination levels suggested by Silverman for this research do not completely agree with values used in most successful experiments prior to 1980. The sequence of tachistoscopic events usually presented in a typical experiment and information-processing considerations suggest that, contrary to Silverman's earlier suggestions, stimulus-field illumination should be higher than blank-field illumination. Aspects of the bleaching hypothesis are questionable, and it seems to be of minimal value because the specifics of how bleaching is thought to interfere with the effects were not documented by reference to the literature in photochemistry. Further empirical investigation of the effect of illumination could be combined with attempts to understand how this variable affects stimulus processing during subliminal psychodynamic activation.
References
1.
BornsteinR. F.MaslingJ. M.Subliminal psychodynamic stimulation: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and therapy. International Forum for Psychoanalysis, 1984, 1, 187–204.
2.
CornsweetT.Visual perception. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
3.
FisherC. D.GlenwickD. S.BlumenthalR. S.Subliminal oedipal stimuli and competitive performance: An investigation of between-groups effects and mediating subject variables. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1986, 95, 292–294.
4.
FribourgA.The effect of fantasies of merging with a good mother on schizophrenic pathology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1981, 169, 337–340.
5.
FudinR.Subliminal psychodynamic activation: Mommy and I are not yet one. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1986, 63, 1159–1179.
6.
GanzL.Temporal factors in visual perception. In CarteretteL. C.FriedmanM. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, 1975. Pp. 169–231.
7.
HaspelK. C.HarrisR. S.Effect of tachistoscopic stimulation of subconscious oedipal wishes on competitive performance: A failure to replicate. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1982, 91, 437–447.
8.
HeilbrunK. S.Silverman's subliminal psychodynamic activation: A failure to replicate. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1980, 89, 560–566.
9.
LitwackT. R.WiedemannC. F.YagerJ.The fear of object loss, responsiveness to subliminal stimuli, and schizophrenic psychopathology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1979, 167, 79–90.
10.
MurchG. M.Temporal gradients of response to subliminal stimuli. Psychological Record, 1967, 17, 483–492.
11.
OliverJ. M.BurkhamR.Subliminal psychodynamic activation in depression: A failure to replicate. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1982, 91, 337–342.
12.
RutsteinE. H.GoldbergerL.The effects of aggressive stimulation on suicidal patients: An experimental study of the psychoanalytic theory of suicide. In RubinsteinB. (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and contemporary science. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan, 1973. Pp. 157–174.
13.
SchiffmanH. R.Sensation and perception. New York: Wiley, 1982.
14.
SilvermanL. H.A study of the effects of subliminally presented aggressive stimuli on the production of pathologic thinking in a nonpsychiatric population. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1965, 141, 443–455.
15.
SilvermanL. H.A technique for the study of psychodynamic relationships: The effects of subliminally presented aggressive stimuli on the production of pathological thinking in a schizophrenic population. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1966, 30, 103–111.
16.
SilvermanL. H.An experimental approach to the study of dynamic propositions in psychoanalysis: The relationship between the aggressive drive and ego regression—initial studies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1967, 15, 376–403.
17.
SilvermanL. H.A comprehensive report of studies using the subliminal psychodynamic activation method. Psychological Research Bulletin, 1980, 20(3), 1–22.
18.
SilvermanL. H.The subliminal psychodynamic activation method: Overview and a comprehensive listing of studies. In MaslingJ. (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983. Pp. 69–100.
19.
SilvermanL. H.BronsteinA.MendelsohnE.The further use of the subliminal psychodynamic activation method for the experimental study of the clinical theory of psychoanalysis: On the specificity of the relationship between symptoms and unconscious conflicts. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1976, 13, 2–16.
20.
SilvermanL. H.CandellP.On the relationship between aggressive activation, symbiotic merging, intactness of body boundaries, and manifest pathology in schizophrenics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1970, 150, 387–399.
21.
SilvermanL. H.FrankS. G.DachingerP.A psychoanalytic reinterpretation of the effectiveness of systematic desensitization: Experimental data bearing on the role of merging fantasies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1974, 83, 313–318.
22.
SilvermanL. H.GoldweberA. M.A further study of the effects of subliminal aggressive stimulation on thinking. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1966, 143, 463–472.
23.
SilvermanL. H.KlingerH.LustbaderL.FarrellJ.MartinA. D.The effects of subliminal drive stimulation on the speech of stutters. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1972, 155, 14–21.
24.
SilvermanL. H.KwawerJ. S.WolitzkyC.CoronM.An experimental study of aspects of the psychoanalytic theory of male homosexuality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1973, 82, 178–188.
25.
SilvermanL. H.LachmannF. M.MilichR. H.The search for oneness. New York: International Universities Press, 1982.
26.
SilvermanL. H.LevinsonP.MendelsohnE.UngaroR.BronsteinA. A.A clinical application of subliminal psychodynamic activation: On the stimulation of symbiotic fantasies as an adjunct in the treatment of hospitalized schizophrenics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1975, 161, 379–392.
27.
SilvermanL. H.RossD. L.AdlerJ. M.LustigD. A.Simple research paradigm for demonstrating subliminal psychodynamic activation: Effects of oedipal stimuli on dart-throwing accuracy in college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978, 87, 341–357.
28.
SilvermanL. H.SilvermanD. K.A clinical-experimental approach to the study of subliminal stimulation: The effects of a drive-related stimulus upon Rorschach responses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 158–172.
29.
SilvermanL. H.SilvermanS. E.The effects of subliminally presented drive stimuli on the cognitive functioning of schizophrenics. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1967, 31, 78–85.
30.
SilvermanL. H.SpiroR. H.Further investigation of the effects of subliminal aggressive stimulation on the ego functioning of schizophrenics. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967, 31, 225–232.
31.
SilvermanL. H.SpiroR. H.The effects of subliminal, supraliminal and vocalized aggression on the ego functioning of schizophrenics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1968, 146, 50–61.
32.
SilvermanL. H.SpiroR. H.WeisbergJ. S.CandellP.The effects of aggressive activation and the need to merge on pathological thinking in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1969, 148, 39–51.
33.
SperlingG.The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 1960, 74, No. 11 (Whole No. 498).
34.
SpiroR. H.SilvermanL. H.Effects of body awareness and aggressive activation on ego functioning of schizophrenics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 28, 575–585.
35.
WatsonJ. P.An experimental method for the study of unconscious conflict. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1975, 48, 299–301.
36.
WoodworthR. S.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1938.
