To ascertain whether there is any relationship between field dependence/independence and performance in school, the Children's Embedded Figures Test and Embedded Figures Test were applied to 103 10- to 14-yr.-olds (55 boys and 48 girls) in Grades 5 to 8 of primary education and Grade 1 of secondary education in Santiago de Compostela (Spain), and the scores were compared with their school marks in Mathematics, Spanish, Natural Sciences, and Social Sciences, and with their over-all mark. Field-independent children performed better in all subjects, especially boys. This finding appears unsupportive of the supposed neutrality of field dependence/independence and suggests that this dimension of cognitive style should be taken into account in education.
References
1.
BertiniM. (1986) Some implications of field dependence for education. In BertiniM.PizzamiglioL.WapnerS. (Eds.), Field dependence in psychological theory: Research and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BowdA. D. (1977) Field-dependence and performance on Piagetian invariance tasks: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 130, 157–158.
3.
BrodzinskyD. M. (1982) Relationship between cognitive style and cognitive development: A 2-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 18, 617–626.
4.
BuenningM.TollefsonN. (1987) The cultural gap hypothesis as an explanation for the achievement patterns of Mexican-American students. Psychology in the Schools, 24, 264–272.
5.
BurielR. (1978) Relationship of three field-dependence measures to the reading and math achievement of Anglo-American and Mexican-American children. Journal of Psychology, 70, 167–174.
6.
CarreteroM.PalaciosJ. (1982) Los estilos cognitivos, introducción al problema de las diferencias cognitivas individuales. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 17, 20–28.
7.
CaseR.GlobersonT. (1974) Field independence and central computing space. Child Development, 45, 772–778.
8.
ClarkL. A.HalfordG. S. (1983) Does cognitive style account for cultural differences in scholastic achievement?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 279–296.
9.
CoopermanE. W. (1980) Field differentiation and intelligence. The Journal of Psychology, 105, 29–33.
10.
CorralA. (1982) La influencia del estilo cognitivo dependencia-independencia de campo en la resolución de dos problemas de física. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 18, 107–123.
11.
FedericoP. A. (1983) Changes in the cognitive components of achievement as students proceed through computed-managed instruction. Journal of Computed-based Instruction, 9, 156–168.
12.
FehrenbachC. R. (1987) Reader processing strategies of average and gifted field-dependent and field-independent eighth, tenth, and twelfth grade students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 886A.
13.
FlexerB. K.RobergeJ. (1980) IQ, field dependence-independence, and the development of formal operational thought. The Journal of General Psychology, 103, 191–201.
GlobersonT.WeinsteinE.SharabanyR. (1985) Teasing out cognitive development from cognitive style: A training study. Developmental Psychology, 21, 682–691.
16.
HillD. (1980) Relation of field independence to development of conservation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 1247–1250.
17.
HulfishS. (1978) Relationship of role identification, self-esteem, and intelligence to sex differences in field independence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 835–842.
18.
HuteauM. (1987) Style cognitif et personnalité: La dépendance-indépendance a l'egard du champ. Lille: Presses Universitaires.
19.
IsmailM.KongN. W. (1985) Relationship of locus of control, cognitive, anxiety, and academic achievement of group of Malaysian primary school children. Psychological Reports, 57, 1127–1134.
20.
JoffeR. T. (1987) Reflection-impulsivity and field dependence-independence as factors in the reading achievement of children with reading difficulties. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 876A.
21.
KaganS.ZahnG. L. (1975) Field dependence and the school achievement gap between Anglo-American and Mexican-American children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 643–650.
22.
KoganN. (1971) Educational implications of cognitive styles. In LesserG. S. (Ed.), Psychology and educational practice. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman. Pp. 242–292.
23.
KoganN. (1980) A cognitive-style approach to metaphoric thinking. In SnowR. E.FedericoP. A.MontagueW. E. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 247–270.
24.
McDonaldE. R. (1984) The relationship of student and faculty field dependence-independence congruence to student academic achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 125–731.
25.
MroslaH.BlackW. L.HardyC. A. (1987) Cognitive learning style and achievement in mathematics. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 14, 26–28.
26.
PalaciosJ.CarreteroM. (1982) Implicaciones educativas de los estilos cognitivos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 18, 83–106.
27.
ReardonL. B. (1987) The effects of presentation mode and cognitive style on immediate recall of map information. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 1177A.
28.
RenningerK. A.SnyderS. S. (1983) Effects of cognitive style on perceived satisfaction and performance among students and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 668–676.
29.
RubleD.NakamuraC. (1972) Task orientation versus social orientation in young children and their attention to relevant social cues. Child Development, 43, 471–480.
30.
SarachoO. N. (1984) Young children's academic achievement as a function of their cognitive styles. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18, 44–50.
31.
SatterlyD. J. (1979) Covariation of cognitive styles, intelligence and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 179–181.
32.
SchumanV. E. (1987) An investigation of IQ, cognitive style and right brain/left brain function as they relate to placement in first grade reading groups. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 248B.
33.
ShadeB. J. (1983) Cognitive strategies as determinants of school achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 488–493.
34.
ShoreB. M.HymovitchJ.LajoieS. P. (1982) Processing differences in relations between ability and field-independence. Psychological Reports, 50, 391–395.
35.
ShymanskyJ. A.YoreL. D. (1980) A study of teaching strategies, student cognitive development, and cognitive style as they relate to student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 369–382.
36.
TestuF. (1984) Rythmicité scolaire, nature de la tâche et dépendance-indépendance à l'égard du champ. L'année Psychologique, 84, 507–523.
37.
TestuF. (1985) Dépendance-indépendance a l'égard du champ: Intelligence et performances verbales et non verbales. Bulletin de Psychologie, 38, 901–907.
38.
VaidyaS.ChanskyN. (1980) Cognitive development and cognitive style as factors in mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 326–330.
39.
Van BlerkomM. L. (1988) Field dependence, sex role self-perceptions, and mathematics achievement in college students: A closer examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 339–347.
40.
VernonP. (1972) The distinctiveness of field independence. Journal of Personality, 40, 366–391.
41.
WatkinsD.AstillaE. (1980) Relationship between field independence, intelligence, and school achievement for Filipino girls. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 593–594.
42.
WitkinH. A.GoodenoughD. R. (1981) Cognitive styles: Essence and origin. New York: International Universities Press.
43.
WitkinH. A.MooreC. A.GoodenoughD. R.CoxP. W. (1977) Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–65.
44.
WitkinH. A.OltmanP. K.RaskinE.KarpS. A. (1971) A manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
45.
YoreL. D. (1986) The effects of lesson structure and cognitive style on the science achievement of elementary school children. School Children, 70, 461–471.
