For 102 college students and 102 “experts” (professionals) inspection of unstandardized paths (LISREL) shows different relationships between Rokeach's terminal values and the construct of liberalism-conservatism, relationships being somewhat greater for “experts” than students (“novices”). The observation was confirmed by structural equation analysis.
References
1.
CochraneR.BilligM.HoggM. (1979) Politics and values in Britain: A test of Rokeach's two-value model In RokeachM. (Ed.), Understanding human values: Individual and socialNew York: Free Press.
2.
RawlsJ.HarrisonC. W.RawlsD. J.HayesR. L.JohnsonA. W. (1973) Comparison of Wallace, Nixon, and Humphrey supporters along certain demographic, attitudinal, and value-system dimensionsPsychological Reports, 32, 35–39.
3.
RokeachM. (1979) The two-value model of political ideology and British politics In RokeachM. (Ed.), Understanding human values: Individual and socialNew York: Free Press. Pp. 179–191.
4.
RousG. L.LeeD. E. (1978) Freedom and equality: Two values of political orientationJournal of Communication, Winter, 45–51.
5.
SearingD. D. (1979) A study of values in the British House of Commons In RokeachM. (Ed.), Understanding human values: Individual and socialNew York: Free Press. Pp. 154–178.
6.
SidaniusJ.DuffyG. (1988) The duality of attitude structure: A test of Kerlinger's Criterial Referents Theory within samples of Swedish and American youthPolitical Psychology, 9, 649–670.
