Research on stress in the workplace has generally focused on situations which the investigator a priori perceives to be stressful for people at work. In the current study, an emic (insider) approach to identification of what constitutes a stressful work event is described as a complement to the outsider's perspective. Using content analysis, two broad categories of work-related stressful events were used to classify situations which the employee perceived to be stressful. Recommendations for research using the methodology are provided.
References
1.
BriefA. P.AtiehJ. M. (1987) Studying job stress: Are we making mountains out of molehills?Journal of Occupational Behavior, 8, 115–126.
2.
CooperC. L.MarshallJ. (1978) Sources of managerial and white collar stress. In CooperC. L.PayneR. (Eds.), Stress at work. New York: Wiley. Pp. 81–105.
3.
DeweP. J. (1989) Examining the nature of work stress: Individual evaluations of stressful experiences and coping. Human Relations, 42, 993–1013.
4.
DeweP. J.GuestD. E. (1990) Methods of coping with stress at work: A conceptual analysis and empirical study of measurement issues. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 135–150.
5.
FolkmanS. (1984) Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.
6.
GlowinkowskiS. P.CooperC. L. (1985) Current issues in organisational stress research. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 38, 212–216.
7.
KrippendorffK. (1980) Content analysisNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
MattesonM. T.IvancevichJ. M. (1987) Controlling work stress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
MoreyN. C.LuthansF. (1984) An emic perspective and ethnoscience methods for organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 9, 27–36.
10.
ScottW. A. (1955) Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325.
11.
TungR. L. (1980) Comparative analysis of the occupational stress profiles of male versus female administrators. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 344–355.