Effects of Learning Modalities on Melodic and Rhythmic Retention and on Vocal Pitch-Matching by Preschool Children

Abstract

To assess whether melodic and rhythmic retention as well as pitch-matching ability could be improved through use of learning modalities, 61 children ages 4 and 5 years were presented music instruction in one of four ways, visually (seeing visual aids with the music), auditorily (singing and listening), kinesthetically (moving to music), or through multimodal presentations. Analysis indicated that preschool children receiving the auditory and multimodal treatments scored significantly higher on both the melodic and rhythmic posttests than on pretests. Children receiving kinesthetic treatment scored significantly lower on both the melodic and rhythmic posttests than the other three classes. Further, children in the auditory and multimodal classes matched pitch significantly better at posttest than children in either the visual or kinesthetic classes.

References

Apfelstadt

(1986) Learning modality: a potential clue in the search for vocal accuracy. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 401, 4–6.

Barbe

, & Swassing

(1979) Teaching through modality strengths; concepts and practices. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Bloser.

Carbo

(1984) Research in learning style and reading: implications for instruction. Theory Into Practice, 23, 72–76.

Gordon

(1989) Audie: a game for understanding and analyzing your child's music potential. Chicago, IL: GIA Publ.

Persellin

D. C.

(1992) Responses to rhythm patterns when presented to children through auditory, visual, and kinesthetic modalities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 306–315.

Persellin

D. C.

(1993) Influence of young children's learning modalities on their pitch matching. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 313–314.

Persellin

D. C.

, & Pierce

(1988) Association of preference for modality to learning of rhythmic patterns in music. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 825–826.